WCMG vs. KNG
WCMG (First Trust WCM Global Equity ETF) and KNG (FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WCMG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while KNG is a Dividend fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. WCMG is actively managed, while KNG is passively managed. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WCMG charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for KNG.
Performance
WCMG vs. KNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WCMG
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KNG
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 4.85%
- YTD
- 7.18%
- 6M
- 6.55%
- 1Y
- 11.94%
- 3Y*
- 7.25%
- 5Y*
- 5.65%
- 10Y*
- —
WCMG vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WCMG First Trust WCM Global Equity ETF | 9.07% |
KNG FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 3.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between WCMG and KNG is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2026 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WCMG vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank
WCMG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KNG
WCMG vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust WCM Global Equity ETF (WCMG) and FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WCMG | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.20 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.39 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.49 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WCMG vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WCMG drawdown since its inception was -5.01%, smaller than the maximum KNG drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCMG and KNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WCMG | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.01% | -35.12% | +30.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -1.30% | +1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.26% | -4.12% | +2.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.42% | — |
Volatility
WCMG vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WCMG | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.18% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.32% | 10.40% | +8.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.32% | 13.59% | +5.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.32% | 17.14% | +2.18% |
WCMG vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
WCMG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
WCMG vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison
WCMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KNG FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 8.32% | 8.61% | 9.08% | 5.91% | 4.00% | 3.45% | 3.62% | 4.09% | 3.46% |
WCMG First Trust WCM Global Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WCMG and KNG have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for WCMG.
KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.32%, compared with 0.00% for WCMG.
WCMG is categorized as Global Equities, while KNG is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for WCMG and 0.75% for KNG.
Find the right allocation for WCMG and KNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer