WCMG vs. QCLN
WCMG (First Trust WCM Global Equity ETF) and QCLN (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - WCMG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while QCLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy Index. WCMG is actively managed, while QCLN is passively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WCMG charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for QCLN.
Performance
WCMG vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WCMG
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QCLN
- 1D
- 4.13%
- 1M
- -7.53%
- YTD
- 37.53%
- 6M
- 36.59%
- 1Y
- 87.93%
- 3Y*
- 6.72%
- 5Y*
- -1.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.28%
WCMG vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WCMG First Trust WCM Global Equity ETF | 9.07% |
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund | 11.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between WCMG and QCLN is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2026 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WCMG vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank
WCMG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QCLN
WCMG vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust WCM Global Equity ETF (WCMG) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WCMG | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.39 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.33 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WCMG vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WCMG drawdown since its inception was -5.01%, smaller than the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCMG and QCLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WCMG | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.01% | -76.18% | +71.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -56.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -69.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -71.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -28.95% | +28.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.26% | -43.38% | +42.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.40% | — |
Volatility
WCMG vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WCMG | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 30.70% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.32% | 38.07% | -18.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.32% | 38.63% | -19.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.32% | 35.25% | -15.93% |
WCMG vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
WCMG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QCLN's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
WCMG vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison
WCMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QCLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund | 0.14% | 0.25% | 0.87% | 0.76% | 0.33% | 0.01% | 0.30% | 0.85% | 1.03% | 0.45% | 1.24% | 0.72% |
WCMG First Trust WCM Global Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WCMG and QCLN have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QCLN is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QCLN is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for WCMG.
QCLN has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.00% for WCMG.
WCMG is categorized as Global Equities, while QCLN is Alternative Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for WCMG and 0.59% for QCLN.
Find the right allocation for WCMG and QCLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer