PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WCMG vs. BDVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WCMG vs. BDVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust WCM Global Equity ETF (WCMG) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


WCMG

1D
0.97%
1M
2.51%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BDVL

1D
0.46%
1M
0.40%
YTD
5.64%
6M
5.28%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCMG vs. BDVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WCMG and BDVL is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2026

0.65

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WCMG vs. BDVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust WCM Global Equity ETF (WCMG) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WCMG vs. BDVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WCMG vs. BDVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCMG drawdown since its inception was -5.01%, smaller than the maximum BDVL drawdown of -7.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCMG and BDVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WCMGBDVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.01%

-7.71%

+2.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-0.56%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.26%

-1.18%

-0.08%

Volatility

WCMG vs. BDVL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WCMGBDVLDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.32%

9.62%

+9.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.32%

9.62%

+9.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.32%

9.62%

+9.70%

WCMG vs. BDVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCMG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BDVL's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

WCMG vs. BDVL - Dividend Comparison

WCMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BDVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WCMG and BDVL have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BDVL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BDVL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for WCMG.

BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 0.00% for WCMG.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for WCMG and 0.40% for BDVL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WCMG and BDVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer