WCLD vs. GINN
WCLD (WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund) and GINN (Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - WCLD tracks the BVP Nasdaq Emerging Cloud Index while GINN tracks the Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WCLD returned -6.46%/yr vs 7.37%/yr for GINN. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WCLD charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GINN.
Performance
WCLD vs. GINN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WCLD achieves a -0.69% return, which is significantly lower than GINN's 10.05% return.
WCLD
- 1D
- -3.28%
- 1M
- 20.60%
- YTD
- -0.69%
- 6M
- 1.46%
- 1Y
- -3.15%
- 3Y*
- 4.16%
- 5Y*
- -6.46%
- 10Y*
- —
GINN
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 6.63%
- YTD
- 10.05%
- 6M
- 10.24%
- 1Y
- 28.46%
- 3Y*
- 20.47%
- 5Y*
- 7.37%
- 10Y*
- —
WCLD vs. GINN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WCLD WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund | -0.69% | -6.69% | 7.35% | 39.35% | -51.64% | -3.21% | 21.66% |
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF | 10.05% | 20.25% | 18.71% | 29.94% | -32.40% | 10.39% | 9.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between WCLD and GINN is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2020 | 0.79 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WCLD and GINN has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
WCLD vs. GINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WCLD
GINN
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
WCLD
GINN
Healthcare
WCLD
GINN
Communication Services
WCLD
GINN
Basic Materials
WCLD
-
GINN
Consumer Cyclical
WCLD
-
GINN
Consumer Defensive
WCLD
-
GINN
Energy
WCLD
-
GINN
Financial Services
WCLD
-
GINN
Industrials
WCLD
-
GINN
Real Estate
WCLD
-
GINN
Utilities
WCLD
-
GINN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WCLD vs. GINN — Risk / Return Rank
WCLD
GINN
WCLD vs. GINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund (WCLD) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WCLD | GINN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | 1.79 | -1.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.11 | 2.48 | -2.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.31 | -0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.09 | 2.22 | -2.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.20 | 8.02 | -8.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WCLD | GINN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 | 1.79 | -1.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | 0.35 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.46 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
WCLD vs. GINN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WCLD drawdown since its inception was -64.90%, which is greater than GINN's maximum drawdown of -41.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCLD and GINN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WCLD | GINN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.90% | -41.25% | -23.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.68% | -13.18% | -21.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.06% | -22.25% | -19.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.90% | -41.25% | -23.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.78% | -0.35% | -46.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.54% | -13.37% | -22.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.71% | 3.64% | +11.07% |
Volatility
WCLD vs. GINN - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund (WCLD) has a higher volatility of 15.21% compared to Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) at 3.66%. This indicates that WCLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WCLD | GINN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.21% | 3.66% | +11.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.91% | 11.99% | +17.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.67% | 16.01% | +18.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.41% | 21.32% | +16.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.46% | 21.05% | +16.41% |
WCLD vs. GINN - Expense Ratio Comparison
WCLD has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than GINN's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
WCLD vs. GINN - Dividend Comparison
WCLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF | 1.15% | 1.26% | 1.26% | 1.01% | 0.69% | 0.67% | 0.07% |
WCLD WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WCLD and GINN have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WCLD has higher volatility (15.21%) compared to GINN (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCLD dropped -64.90% vs GINN's -41.25%.
On 5-year performance, GINN leads with 7.37% vs -6.46% for WCLD. On fees, WCLD is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, GINN has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GINN has performed better with a 7.37% return vs -6.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WCLD is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GINN.
GINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.00% for WCLD.
WCLD tracks BVP Nasdaq Emerging Cloud Index, while GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WCLD and 0.50% for GINN.
GINN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WCLD and GINN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer