PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WCLD vs. GINN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WCLD vs. GINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund (WCLD) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCLD achieves a -0.69% return, which is significantly lower than GINN's 10.05% return.


WCLD

1D
-3.28%
1M
20.60%
YTD
-0.69%
6M
1.46%
1Y
-3.15%
3Y*
4.16%
5Y*
-6.46%
10Y*

GINN

1D
-0.35%
1M
6.63%
YTD
10.05%
6M
10.24%
1Y
28.46%
3Y*
20.47%
5Y*
7.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCLD vs. GINN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
WCLD
WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund
-0.69%-6.69%7.35%39.35%-51.64%-3.21%21.66%
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
10.05%20.25%18.71%29.94%-32.40%10.39%9.84%

Correlation

The correlation between WCLD and GINN is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2020

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between WCLD and GINN has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

WCLD vs. GINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WCLD
GINN

Technology

97.2%
32.4%

Healthcare

2.8%
18.6%

Communication Services

2.5%
10.8%

Basic Materials

-

0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

14.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.0%

Energy

-

1.4%

Financial Services

-

11.4%

Industrials

-

6.1%

Real Estate

-

0.8%

Utilities

-

1.9%

Technology

WCLD
97.2%
GINN
32.4%

Healthcare

WCLD
2.8%
GINN
18.6%

Communication Services

WCLD
2.5%
GINN
10.8%

Basic Materials

WCLD

-

GINN
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

WCLD

-

GINN
14.6%

Consumer Defensive

WCLD

-

GINN
2.0%

Energy

WCLD

-

GINN
1.4%

Financial Services

WCLD

-

GINN
11.4%

Industrials

WCLD

-

GINN
6.1%

Real Estate

WCLD

-

GINN
0.8%

Utilities

WCLD

-

GINN
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WCLD vs. GINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCLD
WCLD Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
WCLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCLD Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
WCLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCLD Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

GINN
GINN Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCLD vs. GINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund (WCLD) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WCLDGINNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.09

1.79

-1.88

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.11

2.48

-2.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.31

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.09

2.22

-2.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.20

8.02

-8.22

WCLD vs. GINN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCLD Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the GINN Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCLD and GINN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WCLDGINNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

1.79

-1.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

0.35

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.46

-0.33

Drawdowns

WCLD vs. GINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCLD drawdown since its inception was -64.90%, which is greater than GINN's maximum drawdown of -41.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCLD and GINN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WCLDGINNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.90%

-41.25%

-23.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.68%

-13.18%

-21.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.06%

-22.25%

-19.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.90%

-41.25%

-23.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.78%

-0.35%

-46.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.54%

-13.37%

-22.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.71%

3.64%

+11.07%

Volatility

WCLD vs. GINN - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund (WCLD) has a higher volatility of 15.21% compared to Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) at 3.66%. This indicates that WCLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WCLDGINNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.21%

3.66%

+11.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.91%

11.99%

+17.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.67%

16.01%

+18.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.41%

21.32%

+16.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.46%

21.05%

+16.41%

WCLD vs. GINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCLD has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than GINN's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

WCLD vs. GINN - Dividend Comparison

WCLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
1.15%1.26%1.26%1.01%0.69%0.67%0.07%
WCLD
WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WCLD and GINN have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WCLD has higher volatility (15.21%) compared to GINN (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCLD dropped -64.90% vs GINN's -41.25%.

On 5-year performance, GINN leads with 7.37% vs -6.46% for WCLD. On fees, WCLD is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, GINN has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GINN has performed better with a 7.37% return vs -6.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WCLD is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GINN.

GINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.00% for WCLD.

WCLD tracks BVP Nasdaq Emerging Cloud Index, while GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WCLD and 0.50% for GINN.

GINN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WCLD and GINN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer