WCBR vs. ASMH

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH).

WCBR and ASMH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WCBR is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree Team8 Cybersecurity Index. It was launched on Jan 28, 2021. ASMH is a passively managed fund by Precidian Funds that tracks the performance of the ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR. It was launched on Mar 13, 2025. Both WCBR and ASMH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

WCBR vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WCBR vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund	-10.44%	5.55%
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	25.77%	58.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCBR achieves a -10.44% return, which is significantly lower than ASMH's 25.77% return.

WCBR

• 1D: 3.56%
• 1M: 3.12%
• YTD: -10.44%
• 6M: -20.50%
• 1Y: -7.95%
• 3Y*: 10.69%
• 5Y*: 2.93%
• 10Y*: —

ASMH

• 1D: 4.15%
• 1M: -6.47%
• YTD: 25.77%
• 6M: 39.55%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCBR vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCBR has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

WCBR

WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund

ASMH

ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF

Return for Risk

WCBR vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCBR

WCBR Risk / Return Rank: 7
WCBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
WCBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
WCBR Omega Ratio Rank: 8
WCBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
WCBR Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCBR vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WCBR	ASMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.26	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.16	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.34	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.85	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WCBR	ASMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.26	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.01	3.00	-2.99

Correlation

The correlation between WCBR and ASMH is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

WCBR vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison

WCBR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%	0.00%	0.03%	0.43%
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	1.29%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

WCBR vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCBR drawdown since its inception was -52.25%, which is greater than ASMH's maximum drawdown of -15.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCBR and ASMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	WCBR	ASMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.25%	-15.89%	-36.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.17%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.50%	-11.21%	-12.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.57%	-4.43%	-16.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.20%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WCBR	ASMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.01%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.84%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.56%	36.81%	-6.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.85%	36.81%	-3.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.00%	36.81%	-3.81%