WCBR vs. ASMH

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

WCBR (WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund) and ASMH (ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - WCBR tracks the WisdomTree Team8 Cybersecurity Index while ASMH tracks the ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, WCBR returned 2.86% vs 124.50% for ASMH. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WCBR charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ASMH.

Performance

WCBR vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCBR achieves a 16.06% return, which is significantly lower than ASMH's 70.49% return.

WCBR

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: -1.12%
• YTD: 16.06%
• 6M: 14.01%
• 1Y: 2.86%
• 3Y*: 19.71%
• 5Y*: 5.57%
• 10Y*: —

ASMH

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 9.98%
• YTD: 70.49%
• 6M: 71.75%
• 1Y: 124.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCBR vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund	16.06%	8.25%
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	70.49%	59.22%

Correlation

The correlation between WCBR and ASMH is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025	0.18

Return for Risk

WCBR vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCBR

WCBR Risk / Return Rank: 10
WCBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
WCBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
WCBR Omega Ratio Rank: 11
WCBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
WCBR Martin Ratio Rank: 10

ASMH

ASMH Risk / Return Rank: 90
ASMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
ASMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
ASMH Omega Ratio Rank: 82
ASMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
ASMH Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCBR vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WCBR	ASMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.09	3.01	-2.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.34	3.46	-3.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.43	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.10	7.88	-7.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.21	20.24	-20.03

WCBR vs. ASMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCBR Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the ASMH Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCBR and ASMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WCBR vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCBR drawdown since its inception was -52.25%, which is greater than ASMH's maximum drawdown of -15.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCBR and ASMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	WCBR	ASMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.25%	-15.89%	-36.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.92%	-15.89%	-14.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.27%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.65%	-8.00%	-4.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.26%	-4.21%	-16.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.33%	6.18%	+7.15%

Volatility

WCBR vs. ASMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) is 13.92%, while ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) has a volatility of 17.32%. This indicates that WCBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WCBR	ASMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.92%	17.32%	-3.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.72%	33.27%	-5.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.63%	41.81%	-9.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.66%	40.23%	-6.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.52%	40.23%	-6.71%

WCBR vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCBR has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

WCBR vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison

WCBR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	1.64%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%	0.00%	0.03%	0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WCBR and ASMH in my portfolio?

WCBR and ASMH have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WCBR or ASMH?

ASMH has higher volatility (17.32%) compared to WCBR (13.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCBR dropped -52.25% vs ASMH's -15.89%.

Which ETF is better, WCBR or ASMH?

On 1-year performance, ASMH leads with 124.50% vs 2.86% for WCBR. On fees, ASMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, WCBR has been the lower-risk option at 13.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WCBR or ASMH?

Over the 1-year period, ASMH has performed better with a 124.50% return vs 2.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WCBR or ASMH?

ASMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WCBR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WCBR or ASMH?

ASMH has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.00% for WCBR.

What is the main difference between WCBR and ASMH?

WCBR tracks WisdomTree Team8 Cybersecurity Index, while ASMH tracks ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Precidian Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WCBR and 0.19% for ASMH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.