WBIL vs. POW

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

WBIL (WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WBIL is a Global Equities fund actively managed by WBI, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. Both are actively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WBIL charges 1.23%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

WBIL vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF (WBIL) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WBIL achieves a 13.20% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 35.68% return.

WBIL

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -1.47%
• 6M: 10.77%
• YTD: 13.20%
• 1Y: 22.96%
• 3Y*: 9.77%
• 5Y*: 5.91%
• 10Y*: 6.67%

POW

• 1D: -3.68%
• 1M: -13.79%
• 6M: 25.01%
• YTD: 35.68%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WBIL vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WBIL WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF	13.20%	-1.94%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	35.68%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between WBIL and POW is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.64

Return for Risk

WBIL vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WBIL

WBIL Risk / Return Rank: 56
WBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
WBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
WBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 51
WBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
WBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 66

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WBIL vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF (WBIL) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WBIL	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.34	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.33	—	—

Drawdowns

WBIL vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WBIL drawdown since its inception was -25.30%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -20.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBIL and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	WBIL	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.30%	-20.28%	-5.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.54%	-20.28%	+16.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.94%	-4.56%	-2.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.47%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WBIL	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.93%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.26%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.49%	33.06%	-17.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.91%	33.06%	-19.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.81%	33.06%	-20.25%

WBIL vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

WBIL has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

WBIL vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

WBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than POW's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WBIL WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF	0.04%	0.05%	0.07%	0.29%	1.03%	2.02%	0.19%	0.73%	0.75%	0.83%	0.58%	0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WBIL and POW in my portfolio?

WBIL and POW have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WBIL or POW?

On fees, POW is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WBIL or POW?

POW is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for WBIL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WBIL or POW?

POW has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.04% for WBIL.

What is the main difference between WBIL and POW?

WBIL is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: WBI and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 1.23% for WBIL and 0.75% for POW.