WBIL vs. AMAGX
Compare and contrast key facts about WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF (WBIL) and Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX).
WBIL is an actively managed fund by WBI. It was launched on Sep 3, 2014. AMAGX is managed by Amana. It was launched on Feb 3, 1994.
Performance
WBIL vs. AMAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WBIL vs. AMAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBIL WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF | -3.45% | -0.47% | 13.29% | 11.79% | -9.60% | 18.67% | -2.19% | 11.65% | -9.67% | 19.31% |
AMAGX Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund | -6.55% | 17.62% | 15.73% | 25.67% | -19.49% | 31.51% | 32.93% | 33.09% | 2.47% | 28.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WBIL achieves a -3.45% return, which is significantly higher than AMAGX's -6.55% return. Over the past 10 years, WBIL has underperformed AMAGX with an annualized return of 5.13%, while AMAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.34% annualized return.
WBIL
- 1D
- 2.26%
- 1M
- -7.61%
- YTD
- -3.45%
- 6M
- -2.18%
- 1Y
- 5.84%
- 3Y*
- 6.65%
- 5Y*
- 3.51%
- 10Y*
- 5.13%
AMAGX
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -9.83%
- YTD
- -6.55%
- 6M
- -4.04%
- 1Y
- 19.84%
- 3Y*
- 14.07%
- 5Y*
- 10.31%
- 10Y*
- 15.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WBIL vs. AMAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WBIL has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than AMAGX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WBIL vs. AMAGX — Risk / Return Rank
WBIL
AMAGX
WBIL vs. AMAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF (WBIL) and Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WBIL | AMAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.38 | 1.02 | -0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.57 | 1.54 | -0.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.22 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.53 | 1.52 | -0.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.80 | 6.41 | -4.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WBIL | AMAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | 1.02 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.57 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.84 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.64 | -0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between WBIL and AMAGX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
WBIL vs. AMAGX - Dividend Comparison
WBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, while AMAGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBIL WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.29% | 1.03% | 2.02% | 0.19% | 0.73% | 0.75% | 0.83% | 0.58% | 0.20% |
AMAGX Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.95% | 0.65% | 3.64% | 0.52% | 5.44% | 3.15% | 3.47% | 10.90% | 13.67% | 7.45% |
Drawdowns
WBIL vs. AMAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WBIL drawdown since its inception was -25.30%, smaller than the maximum AMAGX drawdown of -57.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBIL and AMAGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WBIL | AMAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.30% | -57.64% | +32.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.80% | -11.84% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.30% | -28.09% | +2.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.30% | -28.09% | +2.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.18% | -11.04% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.02% | -10.32% | +3.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.49% | 2.80% | +0.69% |
Volatility
WBIL vs. AMAGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF (WBIL) is 5.21%, while Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX) has a volatility of 5.96%. This indicates that WBIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WBIL | AMAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.21% | 5.96% | -0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.90% | 12.00% | -1.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.51% | 20.16% | -4.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.53% | 18.18% | -4.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.47% | 18.27% | -5.80% |