WBIL vs. AMAGX
Compare and contrast key facts about WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF (WBIL) and Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX).
WBIL is an actively managed fund by WBI. It was launched on Sep 3, 2014. AMAGX is managed by Amana. It was launched on Feb 3, 1994.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WBIL or AMAGX.
Correlation
The correlation between WBIL and AMAGX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
WBIL vs. AMAGX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
WBIL:
1.04
AMAGX:
0.41
WBIL:
1.46
AMAGX:
0.64
WBIL:
1.19
AMAGX:
1.08
WBIL:
1.55
AMAGX:
0.60
WBIL:
3.91
AMAGX:
1.64
WBIL:
3.54%
AMAGX:
4.03%
WBIL:
13.14%
AMAGX:
16.20%
WBIL:
-18.00%
AMAGX:
-57.64%
WBIL:
-4.07%
AMAGX:
-5.97%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WBIL achieves a 3.80% return, which is significantly higher than AMAGX's 1.67% return. Over the past 10 years, WBIL has underperformed AMAGX with an annualized return of 4.70%, while AMAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.04% annualized return.
WBIL
3.80%
2.11%
8.25%
11.64%
6.39%
4.70%
AMAGX
1.67%
0.90%
-2.13%
5.84%
11.87%
9.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WBIL vs. AMAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WBIL has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than AMAGX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WBIL vs. AMAGX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
WBIL
AMAGX
WBIL vs. AMAGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF (WBIL) and Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WBIL vs. AMAGX - Dividend Comparison
WBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, while AMAGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBIL WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF | 0.07% | 0.07% | 0.29% | 1.03% | 2.02% | 0.19% | 0.73% | 0.92% | 0.83% | 0.58% | 0.20% | 0.05% |
AMAGX Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 0.17% | 0.07% | 0.22% | 0.36% | 0.47% | 0.49% | 0.75% | 0.54% | 0.37% |
Drawdowns
WBIL vs. AMAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WBIL drawdown since its inception was -18.00%, smaller than the maximum AMAGX drawdown of -57.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBIL and AMAGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WBIL vs. AMAGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF (WBIL) is 3.47%, while Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX) has a volatility of 4.73%. This indicates that WBIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.