WBIL vs. FGD

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

WBIL (WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF) and FGD (First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund) are both Global Equities funds. WBIL is actively managed, while FGD is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WBIL returned 7.19%/yr vs 9.93%/yr for FGD. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WBIL charges 1.23%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FGD.

Performance

WBIL vs. FGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF (WBIL) and First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WBIL achieves a 17.35% return, which is significantly higher than FGD's 12.52% return. Over the past 10 years, WBIL has underperformed FGD with an annualized return of 7.19%, while FGD has yielded a comparatively higher 9.93% annualized return.

WBIL

• 1D: 1.07%
• 1M: 11.93%
• YTD: 17.35%
• 6M: 16.10%
• 1Y: 30.59%
• 3Y*: 13.28%
• 5Y*: 6.30%
• 10Y*: 7.19%

FGD

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 1.04%
• YTD: 12.52%
• 6M: 13.94%
• 1Y: 34.97%
• 3Y*: 22.97%
• 5Y*: 10.76%
• 10Y*: 9.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WBIL vs. FGD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WBIL WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF	17.35%	-0.47%	13.29%	11.79%	-9.60%	18.67%	-2.19%	11.65%	-9.67%	19.31%
FGD First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund	12.52%	44.42%	5.71%	8.20%	-7.25%	20.83%	-5.23%	20.64%	-12.49%	17.87%

Correlation

The correlation between WBIL and FGD is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2014	0.56

The correlation between WBIL and FGD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

WBIL vs. FGD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WBIL	FGD
Technology	35.5%	1.2%
Industrials	17.1%	14.3%
Consumer Cyclical	11.6%	8.8%
Healthcare	11.6%	-
Financial Services	9.8%	33.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	9.2%
Communication Services	4.3%	9.3%
Energy	2.9%	10.0%
Real Estate	2.8%	2.4%
Basic Materials	2.5%	6.4%
Utilities	0.8%	4.9%

Return for Risk

WBIL vs. FGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WBIL

WBIL Risk / Return Rank: 65
WBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
WBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
WBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 60
WBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
WBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 73

FGD

FGD Risk / Return Rank: 79
FGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FGD Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
FGD Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WBIL vs. FGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF (WBIL) and First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WBIL	FGD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	2.81	-0.66
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	3.78	-0.76
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.51	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.19	3.68	-0.49
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.05	13.02	+1.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WBIL vs. FGD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WBIL Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the FGD Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WBIL and FGD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WBIL	FGD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.16	2.81	-0.66
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	0.73	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	0.55	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.26	+0.14

Drawdowns

WBIL vs. FGD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WBIL drawdown since its inception was -25.30%, smaller than the maximum FGD drawdown of -68.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBIL and FGD.

Drawdown Indicators

	WBIL	FGD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.30%	-68.05%	+42.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.85%	-9.82%	-0.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.30%	-11.50%	-13.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.30%	-28.68%	+3.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.30%	-44.84%	+19.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.79%	+0.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.98%	-12.57%	+5.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	2.78%	-0.54%

Volatility

WBIL vs. FGD - Volatility Comparison

WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF (WBIL) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) at 3.22%. This indicates that WBIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WBIL	FGD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.72%	3.22%	+1.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.75%	9.64%	+1.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.26%	12.51%	+1.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.70%	14.91%	-1.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.65%	18.23%	-5.58%

WBIL vs. FGD - Expense Ratio Comparison

WBIL has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than FGD's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

WBIL vs. FGD - Dividend Comparison

WBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than FGD's 5.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGD First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund	5.03%	5.62%	5.87%	6.44%	5.74%	5.35%	6.17%	5.19%	5.88%	4.01%	4.36%	5.07%
WBIL WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF	0.04%	0.05%	0.07%	0.29%	1.03%	2.02%	0.19%	0.73%	0.75%	0.83%	0.58%	0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WBIL and FGD in my portfolio?

WBIL and FGD have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WBIL or FGD?

WBIL has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to FGD (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WBIL dropped -25.30% vs FGD's -68.05%.

Which ETF is better, WBIL or FGD?

On 10-year performance, FGD leads with 9.93% vs 7.19% for WBIL. On fees, FGD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, FGD has been the lower-risk option at 3.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WBIL or FGD?

Over the 10-year period, FGD has performed better with a 9.93% return vs 7.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WBIL or FGD?

FGD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for WBIL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WBIL or FGD?

FGD has the higher dividend yield at 5.03%, compared with 0.04% for WBIL.

What is the main difference between WBIL and FGD?

They also come from different issuers: WBI and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.23% for WBIL and 0.59% for FGD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.