WBIF vs. INKM
Compare and contrast key facts about WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) and SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM).
WBIF and INKM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WBIF is an actively managed fund by WBI. It was launched on Aug 27, 2014. INKM is an actively managed fund by State Street. It was launched on Apr 25, 2012.
Performance
WBIF vs. INKM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WBIF vs. INKM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF | 1.40% | 9.16% | 3.43% | 0.49% | -8.38% | 16.56% | -2.71% | 2.68% | -4.68% | 19.42% |
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF | 2.48% | 11.86% | 5.70% | 10.26% | -12.58% | 8.52% | 3.11% | 17.12% | -5.32% | 13.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WBIF achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than INKM's 2.48% return. Over the past 10 years, WBIF has underperformed INKM with an annualized return of 4.53%, while INKM has yielded a comparatively higher 5.48% annualized return.
WBIF
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -4.81%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 0.39%
- 1Y
- 8.81%
- 3Y*
- 6.18%
- 5Y*
- 1.67%
- 10Y*
- 4.53%
INKM
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -3.01%
- YTD
- 2.48%
- 6M
- 3.39%
- 1Y
- 10.75%
- 3Y*
- 8.82%
- 5Y*
- 4.13%
- 10Y*
- 5.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WBIF vs. INKM - Expense Ratio Comparison
WBIF has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than INKM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WBIF vs. INKM — Risk / Return Rank
WBIF
INKM
WBIF vs. INKM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) and SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WBIF | INKM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.62 | 1.38 | -0.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.88 | 1.95 | -1.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.29 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 1.92 | -1.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.67 | 8.53 | -5.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WBIF | INKM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 1.38 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.50 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.56 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.55 | -0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between WBIF and INKM is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
WBIF vs. INKM - Dividend Comparison
WBIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than INKM's 5.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF | 0.06% | 0.14% | 1.17% | 0.82% | 0.96% | 2.59% | 0.09% | 1.04% | 0.77% | 0.75% | 0.67% | 0.86% |
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF | 5.01% | 5.82% | 4.83% | 4.56% | 5.03% | 3.74% | 3.88% | 4.38% | 4.08% | 3.10% | 3.39% | 3.45% |
Drawdowns
WBIF vs. INKM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WBIF drawdown since its inception was -20.29%, smaller than the maximum INKM drawdown of -28.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBIF and INKM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WBIF | INKM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.29% | -28.58% | +8.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.51% | -5.76% | -6.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.29% | -19.18% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.29% | -28.58% | +8.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.81% | -3.21% | -1.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.83% | -3.73% | -4.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 1.30% | +2.16% |
Volatility
WBIF vs. INKM - Volatility Comparison
WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) has a higher volatility of 3.36% compared to SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) at 2.97%. This indicates that WBIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INKM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WBIF | INKM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.36% | 2.97% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.03% | 4.62% | +4.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.34% | 7.83% | +6.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.82% | 8.30% | +4.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.24% | 9.77% | +2.47% |