WATT vs. UTF
WATT (Energous Corporation) and UTF (Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc) are both stocks. WATT operates in Scientific & Technical Instruments (Technology), while UTF operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, WATT returned -46.56%/yr vs 11.49%/yr for UTF. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
WATT vs. UTF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WATT achieves a 253.63% return, which is significantly higher than UTF's 20.28% return. Over the past 10 years, WATT has underperformed UTF with an annualized return of -46.56%, while UTF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.49% annualized return.
WATT
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -41.43%
- 6M
- 78.61%
- YTD
- 253.63%
- 1Y
- 20.63%
- 3Y*
- -53.67%
- 5Y*
- -60.74%
- 10Y*
- -46.56%
- ALL TIME*
- -38.51%
UTF
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 11.47%
- YTD
- 20.28%
- 1Y
- 14.01%
- 3Y*
- 15.30%
- 5Y*
- 7.78%
- 10Y*
- 11.49%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.45M | $6.34M | $7.48M | |
| $2.21M | $3.81M | $7.18M |
WATT vs. UTF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WATT Energous Corporation | 253.63% | -86.83% | -44.81% | -89.06% | -33.12% | -30.56% | 1.69% | -69.43% | -70.23% | 15.43% |
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 20.28% | 9.93% | 22.37% | -3.83% | -9.60% | 17.91% | 6.93% | 42.74% | -9.87% | 34.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between WATT and UTF is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2014 | 0.20 |
Fundamentals
WATT:
$20.95M
UTF:
$2.69B
WATT:
-$3.39
UTF:
$6.79
WATT:
3.92
UTF:
6.96
WATT:
1.28
UTF:
0.94
WATT:
$8.37M
UTF:
$387.16M
WATT:
$3.00M
UTF:
$388.42M
WATT:
-$8.08M
UTF:
$765.72M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WATT vs. UTF — Risk / Return Rank
WATT
UTF
WATT vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energous Corporation (WATT) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WATT | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.20 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 1.41 | -1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.45 | 2.88 | -2.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WATT vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WATT drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than UTF's maximum drawdown of -72.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WATT and UTF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WATT | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.98% | -72.62% | -27.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.89% | -10.33% | -60.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.64% | -19.00% | -78.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.77% | -30.28% | -69.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.98% | -52.53% | -47.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.93% | -1.00% | -98.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.32% | -10.30% | -63.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.07% | 5.05% | +34.02% |
Volatility
WATT vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison
Energous Corporation (WATT) has a higher volatility of 29.61% compared to Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) at 2.59%. This indicates that WATT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WATT | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.61% | 2.59% | +27.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 87.44% | 7.98% | +79.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 121.31% | 12.46% | +108.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 266.81% | 18.20% | +248.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 214.07% | 23.30% | +190.77% |
Dividends
WATT vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison
WATT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 6.82% | 7.62% | 7.74% | 8.76% | 7.75% | 6.53% | 7.20% | 7.10% | 10.12% | 7.37% | 10.51% | 8.39% |
WATT Energous Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
WATT vs. UTF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energous Corporation and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
WATT and UTF have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WATT has higher volatility (29.61%) compared to UTF (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WATT dropped -99.98% vs UTF's -72.62%.
UTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WATT and UTF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer