PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WATT vs. BIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WATT vs. BIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Energous Corporation (WATT) and BlackRock Multi-Sector Income Trust (BIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WATT achieves a 253.63% return, which is significantly higher than BIT's 0.22% return. Over the past 10 years, WATT has underperformed BIT with an annualized return of -46.56%, while BIT has yielded a comparatively higher 6.88% annualized return.


WATT

1D
0.57%
1M
-41.43%
6M
78.61%
YTD
253.63%
1Y
20.63%
3Y*
-53.67%
5Y*
-60.74%
10Y*
-46.56%
ALL TIME*
-38.51%

BIT

1D
0.25%
1M
-1.18%
6M
-2.06%
YTD
0.22%
1Y
-3.84%
3Y*
5.01%
5Y*
2.35%
10Y*
6.88%
ALL TIME*
5.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.17M$3.39M$3.44M
$2.21M$3.81M$7.18M

WATT vs. BIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WATT
Energous Corporation
253.63%-86.83%-44.81%-89.06%-33.12%-30.56%1.69%-69.43%-70.23%15.43%
BIT
BlackRock Multi-Sector Income Trust
0.22%2.31%7.43%16.78%-14.41%12.04%19.67%14.50%-8.04%19.97%

Correlation

The correlation between WATT and BIT is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2014

0.15

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WATT:

$20.95M

BIT:

$697.88M

EPS

WATT:

-$3.39

BIT:

$1.37

PS Ratio

WATT:

3.92

BIT:

7.61

PB Ratio

WATT:

1.28

BIT:

0.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

WATT:

$8.37M

BIT:

$91.75M

Gross Profit (TTM)

WATT:

$3.00M

BIT:

$76.64M

EBITDA (TTM)

WATT:

-$8.08M

BIT:

$105.25M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WATT vs. BIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WATT
WATT Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
WATT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WATT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
WATT Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
WATT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
WATT Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

BIT
BIT Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
BIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIT Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
BIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIT Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WATT vs. BIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energous Corporation (WATT) and BlackRock Multi-Sector Income Trust (BIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WATTBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

0.93

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

-0.44

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.45

-0.79

+1.24

WATT vs. BIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WATT Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is higher than the BIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WATT and BIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WATT vs. BIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WATT drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than BIT's maximum drawdown of -43.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WATT and BIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WATTBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.98%

-43.54%

-56.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-70.89%

-8.99%

-61.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.64%

-10.42%

-87.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.77%

-23.72%

-76.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.98%

-43.54%

-56.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.93%

-5.33%

-94.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.32%

-4.87%

-68.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.07%

5.07%

+34.00%

Volatility

WATT vs. BIT - Volatility Comparison

Energous Corporation (WATT) has a higher volatility of 29.61% compared to BlackRock Multi-Sector Income Trust (BIT) at 1.72%. This indicates that WATT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WATTBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.61%

1.72%

+27.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

87.44%

6.24%

+81.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

121.31%

8.37%

+112.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

266.81%

12.04%

+254.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

214.07%

15.98%

+198.09%

Dividends

WATT vs. BIT - Dividend Comparison

WATT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.11%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIT
BlackRock Multi-Sector Income Trust
12.11%11.15%10.17%9.90%9.58%8.18%8.46%8.84%9.12%8.44%11.65%8.66%
WATT
Energous Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

WATT vs. BIT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energous Corporation and BlackRock Multi-Sector Income Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


WATT and BIT have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WATT has higher volatility (29.61%) compared to BIT (1.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WATT dropped -99.98% vs BIT's -43.54%.

WATT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WATT and BIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer