PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WASH vs. QQQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WASH vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc. (WASH) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WASH achieves a 10.72% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's 13.43% return.


WASH

1D
-3.75%
1M
1.06%
YTD
10.72%
6M
10.57%
1Y
21.52%
3Y*
13.08%
5Y*
-4.73%
10Y*
3.07%

QQQI

1D
-0.17%
1M
6.91%
YTD
13.43%
6M
12.92%
1Y
30.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WASH vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
WASH
Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc.
10.72%1.69%10.35%
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
13.43%18.62%19.83%

Correlation

The correlation between WASH and QQQI is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2024

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WASH vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WASH
WASH Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
WASH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WASH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
WASH Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
WASH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
WASH Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQI
QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WASH vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc. (WASH) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WASHQQQIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.43

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

3.18

-1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.99

14.27

-11.28

WASH vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WASH Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WASH and QQQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WASHQQQIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

2.35

-1.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

1.34

-1.10

Drawdowns

WASH vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WASH drawdown since its inception was -60.33%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WASH and QQQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WASHQQQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.33%

-20.00%

-40.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.65%

-9.61%

-8.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.34%

-0.17%

-30.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.44%

-2.20%

-15.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.21%

2.14%

+5.07%

Volatility

WASH vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc. (WASH) has a higher volatility of 6.70% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 2.68%. This indicates that WASH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WASHQQQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.70%

2.68%

+4.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.59%

9.85%

+18.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.04%

12.98%

+21.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.11%

17.07%

+17.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.87%

17.07%

+16.80%

Dividends

WASH vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

WASH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.10%, less than QQQI's 13.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
13.19%13.82%12.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WASH
Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc.
7.10%7.58%5.36%6.92%4.62%3.73%4.58%3.72%3.70%2.89%2.60%3.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


WASH and QQQI have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WASH has higher volatility (6.70%) compared to QQQI (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WASH dropped -60.33% vs QQQI's -20.00%.

QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WASH and QQQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer