PortfoliosLab logo
WASH vs. RF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between WASH and RF is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

WASH vs. RF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc. (WASH) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

WASH:

0.40

RF:

0.57

Sortino Ratio

WASH:

0.91

RF:

1.01

Omega Ratio

WASH:

1.11

RF:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

WASH:

0.31

RF:

0.54

Martin Ratio

WASH:

1.08

RF:

1.43

Ulcer Index

WASH:

15.26%

RF:

12.13%

Daily Std Dev

WASH:

38.64%

RF:

30.72%

Max Drawdown

WASH:

-60.33%

RF:

-92.65%

Current Drawdown

WASH:

-39.73%

RF:

-16.12%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WASH:

$568.12M

RF:

$20.31B

EPS

WASH:

-$1.64

RF:

$2.07

PEG Ratio

WASH:

4.01

RF:

2.91

PS Ratio

WASH:

5.16

RF:

3.05

PB Ratio

WASH:

1.10

RF:

1.20

Total Revenue (TTM)

WASH:

$211.28M

RF:

$9.40B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WASH:

$109.27M

RF:

$6.66B

EBITDA (TTM)

WASH:

-$34.34M

RF:

$2.63B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WASH achieves a -2.58% return, which is significantly higher than RF's -2.93% return. Over the past 10 years, WASH has underperformed RF with an annualized return of 2.36%, while RF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.04% annualized return.


WASH

YTD

-2.58%

1M

8.23%

6M

-20.32%

1Y

14.25%

5Y*

5.95%

10Y*

2.36%

RF

YTD

-2.93%

1M

16.99%

6M

-12.59%

1Y

16.89%

5Y*

22.61%

10Y*

12.04%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

WASH vs. RF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WASH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WASH is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WASH is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WASH is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WASH is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WASH is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WASH is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

RF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RF is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RF is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RF is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RF is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RF is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RF is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

WASH vs. RF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc. (WASH) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current WASH Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the RF Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WASH and RF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

WASH vs. RF - Dividend Comparison

WASH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.61%, more than RF's 4.38% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
WASH
Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc.
7.61%5.36%6.92%4.62%3.73%4.58%3.72%3.70%2.89%2.60%3.44%3.04%
RF
Regions Financial Corporation
4.38%4.17%4.54%3.43%2.98%3.85%3.44%3.44%1.82%1.78%2.40%1.70%

Drawdowns

WASH vs. RF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WASH drawdown since its inception was -60.33%, smaller than the maximum RF drawdown of -92.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WASH and RF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

WASH vs. RF - Volatility Comparison

Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc. (WASH) has a higher volatility of 8.31% compared to Regions Financial Corporation (RF) at 7.68%. This indicates that WASH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

WASH vs. RF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc. and Regions Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20212022202320242025
102.01M
2.32B
(WASH) Total Revenue
(RF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items