WANT vs. BNKU

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

WANT (Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares) and BNKU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs) are both Leveraged Equities funds - WANT tracks the S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index (-300%) while BNKU tracks the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, WANT returned 8.18% vs 111.56% for BNKU. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WANT charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BNKU.

Performance

WANT vs. BNKU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WANT achieves a -14.95% return, which is significantly lower than BNKU's 14.86% return.

WANT

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: -7.09%
• YTD: -14.95%
• 6M: -17.60%
• 1Y: 8.18%
• 3Y*: 12.79%
• 5Y*: -6.22%
• 10Y*: —

BNKU

• 1D: 5.30%
• 1M: 29.28%
• YTD: 14.86%
• 6M: 15.82%
• 1Y: 111.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WANT vs. BNKU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WANT Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares	-14.95%	-6.51%
BNKU MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs	14.86%	34.97%

Correlation

The correlation between WANT and BNKU is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.58

The correlation between WANT and BNKU shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WANT vs. BNKU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WANT	BNKU
Consumer Cyclical	18.4%	-
Communication Services	0.2%	-
Technology	0.2%	-
Industrials	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	100.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

WANT vs. BNKU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WANT

WANT Risk / Return Rank: 13
WANT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
WANT Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
WANT Omega Ratio Rank: 14
WANT Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
WANT Martin Ratio Rank: 12

BNKU

BNKU Risk / Return Rank: 58
BNKU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BNKU Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
BNKU Omega Ratio Rank: 55
BNKU Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
BNKU Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WANT vs. BNKU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WANT	BNKU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.15	1.94	-1.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.60	2.30	-1.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.30	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.20	2.74	-2.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.52	7.20	-6.68

WANT vs. BNKU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WANT Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the BNKU Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WANT and BNKU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WANT vs. BNKU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WANT drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, which is greater than BNKU's maximum drawdown of -61.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WANT and BNKU.

Drawdown Indicators

	WANT	BNKU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.89%	-61.21%	-24.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.27%	-40.97%	-0.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-63.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-85.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-59.01%	-2.63%	-56.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.11%	-18.05%	-25.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.68%	15.55%	+0.13%

Volatility

WANT vs. BNKU - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) has a higher volatility of 18.43% compared to MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) at 15.55%. This indicates that WANT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNKU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WANT	BNKU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.43%	15.55%	+2.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.93%	45.72%	-5.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.30%	57.72%	-3.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.78%	73.10%	-2.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	71.47%	73.10%	-1.63%

WANT vs. BNKU - Expense Ratio Comparison

WANT has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than BNKU's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

WANT vs. BNKU - Dividend Comparison

WANT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, while BNKU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BNKU MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WANT Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares	0.63%	0.65%	0.61%	0.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.07%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WANT and BNKU in my portfolio?

WANT and BNKU have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WANT or BNKU?

WANT has higher volatility (18.43%) compared to BNKU (15.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WANT dropped -85.89% vs BNKU's -61.21%.

Which ETF is better, WANT or BNKU?

On 1-year performance, BNKU leads with 111.56% vs 8.18% for WANT. On fees, BNKU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BNKU has been the lower-risk option at 15.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WANT or BNKU?

Over the 1-year period, BNKU has performed better with a 111.56% return vs 8.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WANT or BNKU?

BNKU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for WANT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WANT or BNKU?

WANT has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.00% for BNKU.

What is the main difference between WANT and BNKU?

WANT tracks S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index (-300%), while BNKU tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Bank of Montreal. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for WANT and 0.95% for BNKU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BNKU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.