WAMVX vs. CAFG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WAMVX (Wasatch Micro Cap Value Fund) and CAFG (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, WAMVX returned 19.01%/yr vs 14.49%/yr for CAFG. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WAMVX charges 1.66%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for CAFG.

Performance

WAMVX vs. CAFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wasatch Micro Cap Value Fund (WAMVX) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WAMVX achieves a 13.63% return, which is significantly lower than CAFG's 25.78% return.

WAMVX

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: 3.55%
• YTD: 13.63%
• 6M: 14.86%
• 1Y: 29.15%
• 3Y*: 19.01%
• 5Y*: 4.78%
• 10Y*: 14.00%

CAFG

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 4.31%
• YTD: 25.78%
• 6M: 24.70%
• 1Y: 31.67%
• 3Y*: 14.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAMVX vs. CAFG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
WAMVX Wasatch Micro Cap Value Fund	13.63%	9.31%	24.40%	14.29%
CAFG Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	25.78%	0.17%	6.95%	20.44%

Correlation

The correlation between WAMVX and CAFG is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2023	0.85

The correlation between WAMVX and CAFG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WAMVX vs. CAFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAMVX

WAMVX Risk / Return Rank: 33
WAMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
WAMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
WAMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
WAMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
WAMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

CAFG

CAFG Risk / Return Rank: 61
CAFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
CAFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
CAFG Omega Ratio Rank: 50
CAFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
CAFG Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAMVX vs. CAFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Micro Cap Value Fund (WAMVX) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WAMVX	CAFG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	1.83	-0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	2.63	-0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.31	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.32	3.91	-1.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.74	12.74	-5.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WAMVX vs. CAFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WAMVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the CAFG Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WAMVX and CAFG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WAMVX	CAFG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.61	1.83	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.87	-0.22

Drawdowns

WAMVX vs. CAFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAMVX drawdown since its inception was -60.71%, which is greater than CAFG's maximum drawdown of -23.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAMVX and CAFG.

Drawdown Indicators

	WAMVX	CAFG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.71%	-23.66%	-37.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.33%	-8.13%	-5.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.66%	-23.66%	0.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.69%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.38%	+0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.24%	-5.53%	-4.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.99%	2.49%	+1.50%

Volatility

WAMVX vs. CAFG - Volatility Comparison

Wasatch Micro Cap Value Fund (WAMVX) has a higher volatility of 5.71% compared to Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) at 5.20%. This indicates that WAMVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WAMVX	CAFG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.71%	5.20%	+0.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.01%	12.75%	+1.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.18%	17.40%	+1.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.57%	19.58%	+0.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.33%	19.58%	+1.75%

WAMVX vs. CAFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAMVX has a 1.66% expense ratio, which is higher than CAFG's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

WAMVX vs. CAFG - Dividend Comparison

WAMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.86%, more than CAFG's 0.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CAFG Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	0.27%	0.35%	0.36%	0.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WAMVX Wasatch Micro Cap Value Fund	9.86%	11.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	22.38%	13.06%	9.03%	13.59%	7.98%	1.67%	12.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WAMVX and CAFG in my portfolio?

WAMVX and CAFG have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WAMVX or CAFG?

WAMVX has higher volatility (5.71%) compared to CAFG (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WAMVX dropped -60.71% vs CAFG's -23.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CAFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.