PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WAMCX vs. WMCVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WAMCX vs. WMCVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund (WAMCX) and Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund (WMCVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WAMCX achieves a 7.13% return, which is significantly lower than WMCVX's 8.71% return. Over the past 10 years, WAMCX has outperformed WMCVX with an annualized return of 12.27%, while WMCVX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.44% annualized return.


WAMCX

1D
0.06%
1M
5.08%
YTD
7.13%
6M
4.32%
1Y
17.44%
3Y*
7.28%
5Y*
-3.87%
10Y*
12.27%

WMCVX

1D
1.14%
1M
1.35%
YTD
8.71%
6M
7.12%
1Y
12.73%
3Y*
13.34%
5Y*
4.39%
10Y*
10.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAMCX vs. WMCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WAMCX
Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund
7.13%-2.85%8.25%19.19%-39.71%5.23%71.48%38.09%10.34%31.60%
WMCVX
Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund
8.71%-3.66%11.65%31.78%-21.61%25.23%12.52%23.63%-9.55%19.54%

Correlation

The correlation between WAMCX and WMCVX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 1997

0.82

The correlation between WAMCX and WMCVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WAMCX vs. WMCVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAMCX
WAMCX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
WAMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WAMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
WAMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
WAMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
WAMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

WMCVX
WMCVX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
WMCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
WMCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAMCX vs. WMCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund (WAMCX) and Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund (WMCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WAMCXWMCVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.14

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

1.21

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.76

3.36

+0.41

WAMCX vs. WMCVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WAMCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is comparable to the WMCVX Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WAMCX and WMCVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WAMCXWMCVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

0.78

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

0.20

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.45

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.51

-0.12

Drawdowns

WAMCX vs. WMCVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAMCX drawdown since its inception was -66.51%, roughly equal to the maximum WMCVX drawdown of -65.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAMCX and WMCVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WAMCXWMCVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.51%

-65.79%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.89%

-12.06%

-4.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.21%

-28.75%

-4.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.18%

-32.26%

-20.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.18%

-46.29%

-6.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.01%

-5.94%

-22.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.15%

-10.95%

-4.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.13%

4.32%

+0.81%

Volatility

WAMCX vs. WMCVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund (WAMCX) is 4.94%, while Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund (WMCVX) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that WAMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMCVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WAMCXWMCVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.94%

5.61%

-0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.89%

13.45%

+2.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.33%

18.62%

+2.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.39%

22.56%

+4.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.62%

23.47%

+2.15%

WAMCX vs. WMCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WAMCX and WMCVX have an expense ratio of 1.16%.


Dividends

WAMCX vs. WMCVX - Dividend Comparison

WAMCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WMCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.69%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WAMCX
Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%12.08%2.99%1.96%7.65%11.92%11.44%9.18%
WMCVX
Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund
5.69%6.19%17.18%3.67%2.39%7.72%0.00%1.10%8.98%6.63%0.07%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


WAMCX and WMCVX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WMCVX has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to WAMCX (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WAMCX dropped -66.51% vs WMCVX's -65.79%.

WAMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WAMCX and WMCVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer