WAMCX vs. GPMCX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

WAMCX (Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund) and GPMCX (Grandeur Peak Global Micro Cap Fund) are both mutual funds - WAMCX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Wasatch, while GPMCX is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund managed by Grandeur Peak Funds. Over the past 10 years, WAMCX returned 11.90%/yr vs 8.54%/yr for GPMCX. Their 0.58 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. WAMCX charges 1.16%/yr vs 1.85%/yr for GPMCX.

Performance

WAMCX vs. GPMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund (WAMCX) and Grandeur Peak Global Micro Cap Fund (GPMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WAMCX achieves a 10.58% return, which is significantly higher than GPMCX's 1.74% return. Over the past 10 years, WAMCX has outperformed GPMCX with an annualized return of 11.90%, while GPMCX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.54% annualized return.

WAMCX

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: -3.53%
• 6M: 9.20%
• YTD: 10.58%
• 1Y: 23.16%
• 3Y*: 5.45%
• 5Y*: -4.18%
• 10Y*: 11.90%
• ALL TIME*: 9.43%

GPMCX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: -0.50%
• 6M: 4.15%
• YTD: 1.74%
• 1Y: 5.20%
• 3Y*: 7.86%
• 5Y*: -1.96%
• 10Y*: 8.54%
• ALL TIME*: 8.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GPMCX Grandeur Peak Global Micro Cap Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
WAMCX Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

WAMCX vs. GPMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WAMCX Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund	10.58%	-2.85%	8.25%	19.19%	-39.71%	5.23%	71.48%	38.09%	10.34%	31.60%
GPMCX Grandeur Peak Global Micro Cap Fund	1.74%	13.25%	3.22%	12.46%	-31.66%	17.27%	53.02%	23.79%	-17.74%	31.50%

Correlation

The correlation between WAMCX and GPMCX is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.62
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.58

The correlation between WAMCX and GPMCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WAMCX vs. GPMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WAMCX

WAMCX Risk / Return Rank: 26
WAMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
WAMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
WAMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
WAMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
WAMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

GPMCX

GPMCX Risk / Return Rank: 9
GPMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
GPMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
GPMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
GPMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
GPMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WAMCX vs. GPMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund (WAMCX) and Grandeur Peak Global Micro Cap Fund (GPMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WAMCX	GPMCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	0.39	+0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.51	0.66	+0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.08	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.24	0.40	+0.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.31	1.19	+3.12

WAMCX vs. GPMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WAMCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is higher than the GPMCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WAMCX and GPMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WAMCX vs. GPMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAMCX drawdown since its inception was -66.51%, which is greater than GPMCX's maximum drawdown of -44.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAMCX and GPMCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WAMCX	GPMCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.51%	-44.27%	-22.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.89%	-13.75%	-3.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.21%	-16.40%	-16.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.18%	-44.27%	-8.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.18%	-44.27%	-8.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.70%	-14.85%	-10.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.21%	-15.06%	-0.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.86%	4.62%	+0.24%

Volatility

WAMCX vs. GPMCX - Volatility Comparison

Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund (WAMCX) and Grandeur Peak Global Micro Cap Fund (GPMCX) have volatilities of 4.27% and 4.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WAMCX	GPMCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.27%	4.46%	-0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.64%	11.80%	+4.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.88%	14.23%	+7.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.48%	15.17%	+12.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.61%	14.88%	+10.73%

WAMCX vs. GPMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAMCX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is lower than GPMCX's 1.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

WAMCX vs. GPMCX - Dividend Comparison

WAMCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GPMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GPMCX Grandeur Peak Global Micro Cap Fund	3.27%	3.33%	0.53%	0.00%	0.00%	15.76%	8.25%	0.69%	6.99%	7.34%	1.20%	0.00%
WAMCX Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	12.08%	2.99%	1.96%	7.65%	11.92%	11.44%	9.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WAMCX and GPMCX in my portfolio?

WAMCX and GPMCX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WAMCX or GPMCX?

GPMCX has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to WAMCX (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WAMCX dropped -66.51% vs GPMCX's -44.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WAMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.