PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WAMA vs. TDSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WAMA vs. TDSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA) and Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


WAMA

1D
-0.73%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TDSB

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.64%
YTD
4.54%
6M
4.50%
1Y
14.83%
3Y*
8.77%
5Y*
2.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAMA vs. TDSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WAMA and TDSB is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026

0.61

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WAMA vs. TDSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAMA

TDSB
TDSB Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
TDSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDSB Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TDSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDSB Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAMA vs. TDSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA) and Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF (TDSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WAMA vs. TDSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WAMATDSBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.87

0.31

+4.56

Drawdowns

WAMA vs. TDSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAMA drawdown since its inception was -1.91%, smaller than the maximum TDSB drawdown of -19.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAMA and TDSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WAMATDSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.91%

-19.56%

+17.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-0.90%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.39%

-9.12%

+8.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

Volatility

WAMA vs. TDSB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WAMATDSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.20%

5.98%

+3.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.20%

7.32%

+1.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.20%

7.53%

+1.67%

WAMA vs. TDSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAMA has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than TDSB's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

WAMA vs. TDSB - Dividend Comparison

WAMA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
TDSB
Cabana Target Drawdown 7 ETF
2.13%1.93%3.50%2.77%1.81%1.75%0.46%
WAMA
WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WAMA and TDSB have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WAMA is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WAMA is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for TDSB.

TDSB has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.00% for WAMA.

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for WAMA and 0.69% for TDSB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WAMA and TDSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer