WAMA vs. RHRX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WAMA (WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund) and RHRX (RH Tactical Rotation ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. WAMA is passively managed, while RHRX is actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WAMA charges 0.32%/yr vs 1.36%/yr for RHRX.

Performance

WAMA vs. RHRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA) and RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

WAMA

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RHRX

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 6.95%
• YTD: 21.30%
• 6M: 21.26%
• 1Y: 40.94%
• 3Y*: 22.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAMA vs. RHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund	2.77%
RHRX RH Tactical Rotation ETF	3.48%

Correlation

The correlation between WAMA and RHRX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026	0.79

Return for Risk

WAMA vs. RHRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RHRX

RHRX Risk / Return Rank: 90
RHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
RHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
RHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
RHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
RHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAMA vs. RHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA) and RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WAMA	RHRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	4.87	0.53	+4.34

Drawdowns

WAMA vs. RHRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAMA drawdown since its inception was -1.91%, smaller than the maximum RHRX drawdown of -25.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAMA and RHRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WAMA	RHRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.91%	-25.33%	+23.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.83%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.73%	-0.34%	-0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.39%	-8.95%	+8.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.74%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WAMA	RHRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.35%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.73%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.20%	13.19%	-3.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.20%	19.03%	-9.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.20%	19.03%	-9.83%

WAMA vs. RHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAMA has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than RHRX's 1.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

WAMA vs. RHRX - Dividend Comparison

Neither WAMA nor RHRX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WAMA and RHRX in my portfolio?

WAMA and RHRX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WAMA or RHRX?

On fees, WAMA is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WAMA or RHRX?

WAMA is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 1.36% for RHRX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WAMA or RHRX?

WAMA and RHRX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between WAMA and RHRX?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Adaptive. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for WAMA and 1.36% for RHRX.