WAIGX vs. WMCVX
WAIGX (Wasatch International Growth Fund) and WMCVX (Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund) are both mutual funds - WAIGX is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund managed by Wasatch, while WMCVX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Wasatch. Over the past 10 years, WAIGX returned 4.61%/yr vs 10.22%/yr for WMCVX. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WAIGX charges 1.44%/yr vs 1.16%/yr for WMCVX.
Performance
WAIGX vs. WMCVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WAIGX achieves a 7.73% return, which is significantly lower than WMCVX's 11.72% return. Over the past 10 years, WAIGX has underperformed WMCVX with an annualized return of 4.61%, while WMCVX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.22% annualized return.
WAIGX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- 6M
- 5.58%
- YTD
- 7.73%
- 1Y
- -0.37%
- 3Y*
- 8.30%
- 5Y*
- -2.54%
- 10Y*
- 4.61%
WMCVX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 3.95%
- YTD
- 11.72%
- 1Y
- 10.32%
- 3Y*
- 11.58%
- 5Y*
- 5.08%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
WAIGX vs. WMCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WAIGX Wasatch International Growth Fund | 7.73% | 11.89% | -0.62% | 11.64% | -36.64% | 10.86% | 24.65% | 29.43% | -15.86% | 33.04% |
WMCVX Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund | 11.72% | -3.66% | 11.65% | 31.78% | -21.61% | 25.23% | 12.52% | 23.63% | -9.55% | 19.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between WAIGX and WMCVX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2002 | 0.58 |
The correlation between WAIGX and WMCVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WAIGX vs. WMCVX — Risk / Return Rank
WAIGX
WMCVX
WAIGX vs. WMCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch International Growth Fund (WAIGX) and Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund (WMCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WAIGX | WMCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.09 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | 0.74 | -0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.12 | 2.05 | -2.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WAIGX vs. WMCVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WAIGX drawdown since its inception was -67.66%, roughly equal to the maximum WMCVX drawdown of -65.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAIGX and WMCVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WAIGX | WMCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.66% | -65.79% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.68% | -12.06% | -5.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.49% | -28.75% | +9.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.06% | -32.26% | -15.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.06% | -46.29% | -1.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.81% | -3.34% | -17.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.35% | -10.93% | -3.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.21% | 4.35% | +2.86% |
Volatility
WAIGX vs. WMCVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Wasatch International Growth Fund (WAIGX) is 4.95%, while Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund (WMCVX) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that WAIGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMCVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WAIGX | WMCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.95% | 5.65% | -0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.17% | 13.79% | -0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.24% | 18.90% | -3.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.93% | 22.57% | -3.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.08% | 23.44% | -5.36% |
WAIGX vs. WMCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WAIGX has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than WMCVX's 1.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
WAIGX vs. WMCVX - Dividend Comparison
WAIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.92%, more than WMCVX's 5.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WAIGX Wasatch International Growth Fund | 49.92% | 53.78% | 20.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.13% | 10.93% | 2.50% | 17.84% | 2.71% | 4.01% | 0.00% |
WMCVX Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund | 5.54% | 6.19% | 17.18% | 3.67% | 2.39% | 7.72% | 0.00% | 1.10% | 8.98% | 6.63% | 0.07% | 0.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WAIGX and WMCVX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WMCVX has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to WAIGX (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WAIGX dropped -67.66% vs WMCVX's -65.79%.
WMCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WAIGX and WMCVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer