WAIGX vs. MIDLX
Compare and contrast key facts about Wasatch International Growth Fund (WAIGX) and MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 (MIDLX).
WAIGX is managed by Wasatch. It was launched on Jun 27, 2002. MIDLX is a passively managed fund by MFS that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Country World ex-US Small Mid Cap Index. It was launched on Jun 1, 2012.
Performance
WAIGX vs. MIDLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WAIGX vs. MIDLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WAIGX Wasatch International Growth Fund | -7.93% | 11.89% | -0.62% | 11.64% | -36.64% | 10.86% | 24.65% | 29.43% | -15.86% | 33.04% |
MIDLX MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 | -1.87% | 17.03% | 3.33% | 13.21% | -18.52% | 5.17% | 10.15% | 24.97% | -10.29% | 30.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WAIGX achieves a -7.93% return, which is significantly lower than MIDLX's -1.87% return. Over the past 10 years, WAIGX has underperformed MIDLX with an annualized return of 3.25%, while MIDLX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.30% annualized return.
WAIGX
- 1D
- 2.80%
- 1M
- -6.92%
- YTD
- -7.93%
- 6M
- -10.56%
- 1Y
- 3.42%
- 3Y*
- 2.52%
- 5Y*
- -4.37%
- 10Y*
- 3.25%
MIDLX
- 1D
- 2.26%
- 1M
- -8.27%
- YTD
- -1.87%
- 6M
- -2.69%
- 1Y
- 11.54%
- 3Y*
- 8.22%
- 5Y*
- 2.54%
- 10Y*
- 6.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WAIGX vs. MIDLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WAIGX has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than MIDLX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WAIGX vs. MIDLX — Risk / Return Rank
WAIGX
MIDLX
WAIGX vs. MIDLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch International Growth Fund (WAIGX) and MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 (MIDLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WAIGX | MIDLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.26 | 0.98 | -0.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.46 | 1.32 | -0.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.19 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 0.92 | -0.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.42 | 3.46 | -3.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WAIGX | MIDLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | 0.98 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.24 | 0.20 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 0.45 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.55 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between WAIGX and MIDLX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
WAIGX vs. MIDLX - Dividend Comparison
WAIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 58.41%, more than MIDLX's 3.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WAIGX Wasatch International Growth Fund | 58.41% | 53.78% | 20.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.13% | 10.93% | 2.50% | 17.84% | 2.71% | 4.01% | 0.00% |
MIDLX MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 | 3.44% | 3.37% | 10.08% | 4.21% | 5.85% | 5.19% | 4.03% | 4.36% | 6.82% | 1.63% | 1.09% | 1.25% |
Drawdowns
WAIGX vs. MIDLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WAIGX drawdown since its inception was -67.66%, which is greater than MIDLX's maximum drawdown of -34.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAIGX and MIDLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WAIGX | MIDLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.66% | -34.70% | -32.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.68% | -11.75% | -5.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.06% | -33.58% | -14.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.06% | -34.70% | -13.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.33% | -9.75% | -22.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.25% | -6.96% | -7.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.82% | 3.12% | +3.70% |
Volatility
WAIGX vs. MIDLX - Volatility Comparison
Wasatch International Growth Fund (WAIGX) has a higher volatility of 6.67% compared to MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 (MIDLX) at 5.67%. This indicates that WAIGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MIDLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WAIGX | MIDLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.67% | 5.67% | +1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.24% | 8.48% | +1.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.51% | 12.28% | +3.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.63% | 13.09% | +5.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 13.93% | +4.17% |