WACPX vs. FKINX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WACPX (Western Asset Core Plus Bond Fund Class I) and FKINX (Franklin Income Fund Class A1) are both mutual funds - WACPX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while FKINX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 10 years, WACPX returned 1.81%/yr vs 7.44%/yr for FKINX. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WACPX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for FKINX.

Performance

WACPX vs. FKINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Western Asset Core Plus Bond Fund Class I (WACPX) and Franklin Income Fund Class A1 (FKINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WACPX achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly lower than FKINX's 4.75% return. Over the past 10 years, WACPX has underperformed FKINX with an annualized return of 1.81%, while FKINX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.44% annualized return.

WACPX

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 0.19%
• YTD: 0.14%
• 6M: 0.34%
• 1Y: 4.84%
• 3Y*: 3.95%
• 5Y*: -1.23%
• 10Y*: 1.81%

FKINX

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 4.75%
• 6M: 5.17%
• 1Y: 13.85%
• 3Y*: 10.15%
• 5Y*: 6.16%
• 10Y*: 7.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WACPX vs. FKINX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WACPX Western Asset Core Plus Bond Fund Class I	0.14%	7.99%	-0.77%	7.51%	-18.79%	-2.24%	9.42%	12.29%	-1.47%	7.10%
FKINX Franklin Income Fund Class A1	4.75%	12.24%	7.12%	8.65%	-5.29%	17.21%	3.57%	15.75%	-5.54%	8.43%

Correlation

The correlation between WACPX and FKINX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 1998	0.15

Over the past year, WACPX and FKINX have become more correlated (0.39) than their long-term average of 0.15, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

WACPX vs. FKINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WACPX

WACPX Risk / Return Rank: 20
WACPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
WACPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
WACPX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
WACPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
WACPX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

FKINX

FKINX Risk / Return Rank: 84
FKINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
FKINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
FKINX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FKINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FKINX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WACPX vs. FKINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset Core Plus Bond Fund Class I (WACPX) and Franklin Income Fund Class A1 (FKINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WACPX	FKINX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	2.65	-1.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.95	3.96	-2.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.57	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.54	4.20	-2.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.77	17.06	-12.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WACPX vs. FKINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WACPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the FKINX Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WACPX and FKINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WACPX	FKINX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.29	2.65	-1.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.17	0.78	-0.95
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29	0.80	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	0.90	0.00

Drawdowns

WACPX vs. FKINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WACPX drawdown since its inception was -25.86%, smaller than the maximum FKINX drawdown of -43.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WACPX and FKINX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WACPX	FKINX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.86%	-43.18%	+17.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.60%	-3.43%	-0.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.55%	-7.42%	-2.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.46%	-13.20%	-12.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.86%	-23.91%	-1.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.42%	-0.39%	-8.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.61%	-3.71%	+0.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.16%	0.84%	+0.32%

Volatility

WACPX vs. FKINX - Volatility Comparison

Western Asset Core Plus Bond Fund Class I (WACPX) has a higher volatility of 1.45% compared to Franklin Income Fund Class A1 (FKINX) at 1.20%. This indicates that WACPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FKINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WACPX	FKINX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.45%	1.20%	+0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.10%	3.80%	-0.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.32%	5.42%	-1.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.41%	7.91%	-0.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.17%	9.27%	-3.10%

WACPX vs. FKINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WACPX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FKINX's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

WACPX vs. FKINX - Dividend Comparison

WACPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, less than FKINX's 5.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FKINX Franklin Income Fund Class A1	5.55%	5.58%	5.59%	5.52%	5.22%	6.52%	5.22%	5.11%	5.34%	5.04%	5.19%	5.71%
WACPX Western Asset Core Plus Bond Fund Class I	4.79%	4.70%	4.80%	4.88%	3.46%	2.99%	4.12%	4.98%	4.01%	3.30%	4.77%	3.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WACPX and FKINX in my portfolio?

WACPX and FKINX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WACPX or FKINX?

WACPX has higher volatility (1.45%) compared to FKINX (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WACPX dropped -25.86% vs FKINX's -43.18%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FKINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.