PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FKINX vs. CAIBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FKINX vs. CAIBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Income Fund Class A1 (FKINX) and American Funds Capital Income Builder Class A (CAIBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKINX achieves a 5.62% return, which is significantly lower than CAIBX's 10.47% return. Over the past 10 years, FKINX has underperformed CAIBX with an annualized return of 7.18%, while CAIBX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.96% annualized return.


FKINX

1D
0.39%
1M
0.00%
6M
2.63%
YTD
5.62%
1Y
12.34%
3Y*
9.47%
5Y*
6.43%
10Y*
7.18%
ALL TIME*
7.91%

CAIBX

1D
0.08%
1M
1.68%
6M
6.74%
YTD
10.47%
1Y
18.93%
3Y*
14.96%
5Y*
9.17%
10Y*
7.96%
ALL TIME*
9.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FKINX vs. CAIBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FKINX
Franklin Income Fund Class A1
5.62%12.24%7.12%8.65%-5.29%17.21%3.57%15.75%-5.54%8.43%
CAIBX
American Funds Capital Income Builder Class A
10.47%20.39%10.24%8.95%-7.14%14.99%3.20%17.23%-7.28%13.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FKINX and CAIBX is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 1987

0.68

The correlation between FKINX and CAIBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FKINX vs. CAIBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FKINX
FKINX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FKINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKINX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FKINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKINX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

CAIBX
CAIBX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CAIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
CAIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FKINX vs. CAIBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Income Fund Class A1 (FKINX) and American Funds Capital Income Builder Class A (CAIBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FKINXCAIBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.43

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

2.89

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.79

11.56

+3.23

FKINX vs. CAIBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKINX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the CAIBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKINX and CAIBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FKINX vs. CAIBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKINX drawdown since its inception was -43.18%, roughly equal to the maximum CAIBX drawdown of -43.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKINX and CAIBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FKINXCAIBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.18%

-43.68%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.43%

-6.47%

+3.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.42%

-8.89%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.20%

-17.65%

+4.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.91%

-25.28%

+1.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.70%

-3.79%

+0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

1.62%

-0.78%

Volatility

FKINX vs. CAIBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Income Fund Class A1 (FKINX) is 1.60%, while American Funds Capital Income Builder Class A (CAIBX) has a volatility of 1.94%. This indicates that FKINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAIBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FKINXCAIBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.60%

1.94%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.94%

6.56%

-2.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.48%

8.19%

-2.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.84%

9.97%

-2.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.17%

10.77%

-1.60%

FKINX vs. CAIBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKINX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than CAIBX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

FKINX vs. CAIBX - Dividend Comparison

FKINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, less than CAIBX's 7.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAIBX
American Funds Capital Income Builder Class A
7.10%7.71%5.76%3.47%3.43%3.14%3.38%4.10%3.55%4.44%3.52%3.62%
FKINX
Franklin Income Fund Class A1
5.11%5.58%5.59%5.52%5.22%6.52%5.22%5.11%5.34%5.04%5.19%5.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


FKINX and CAIBX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAIBX has higher volatility (1.94%) compared to FKINX (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKINX dropped -43.18% vs CAIBX's -43.68%.

FKINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FKINX and CAIBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer