PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
WACPX vs. FTBFX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between WACPX and FTBFX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

WACPX vs. FTBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Western Asset Core Plus Bond Fund Class I (WACPX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%1.00%2.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-1.96%
-0.74%
WACPX
FTBFX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

WACPX:

0.27

FTBFX:

0.82

Sortino Ratio

WACPX:

0.41

FTBFX:

1.21

Omega Ratio

WACPX:

1.05

FTBFX:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

WACPX:

0.08

FTBFX:

0.47

Martin Ratio

WACPX:

0.60

FTBFX:

2.44

Ulcer Index

WACPX:

2.83%

FTBFX:

1.73%

Daily Std Dev

WACPX:

6.31%

FTBFX:

5.25%

Max Drawdown

WACPX:

-26.54%

FTBFX:

-17.80%

Current Drawdown

WACPX:

-15.98%

FTBFX:

-2.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WACPX achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly higher than FTBFX's 0.32% return. Over the past 10 years, WACPX has underperformed FTBFX with an annualized return of 0.88%, while FTBFX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.16% annualized return.


WACPX

YTD

0.77%

1M

0.77%

6M

-1.96%

1Y

0.04%

5Y*

-2.17%

10Y*

0.88%

FTBFX

YTD

0.32%

1M

0.32%

6M

-0.74%

1Y

3.26%

5Y*

0.61%

10Y*

2.16%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WACPX vs. FTBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WACPX and FTBFX have an expense ratio of 0.45%.


WACPX
Western Asset Core Plus Bond Fund Class I
Expense ratio chart for WACPX: current value at 0.45% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.45%
Expense ratio chart for FTBFX: current value at 0.45% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.45%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

WACPX vs. FTBFX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WACPX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WACPX is 1111
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WACPX is 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WACPX is 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WACPX is 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WACPX is 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WACPX is 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

FTBFX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FTBFX is 3939
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FTBFX is 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FTBFX is 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FTBFX is 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FTBFX is 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FTBFX is 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

WACPX vs. FTBFX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset Core Plus Bond Fund Class I (WACPX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for WACPX, currently valued at 0.20, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.200.82
The chart of Sortino ratio for WACPX, currently valued at 0.31, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.311.21
The chart of Omega ratio for WACPX, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.041.14
The chart of Calmar ratio for WACPX, currently valued at 0.06, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.060.47
The chart of Martin ratio for WACPX, currently valued at 0.47, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.000.472.44
WACPX
FTBFX

The current WACPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the FTBFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WACPX and FTBFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.20
0.82
WACPX
FTBFX

Dividends

WACPX vs. FTBFX - Dividend Comparison

WACPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, less than FTBFX's 5.13% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
WACPX
Western Asset Core Plus Bond Fund Class I
4.38%4.81%4.23%3.49%2.72%2.71%3.69%3.54%3.03%3.74%3.18%3.45%
FTBFX
Fidelity Total Bond Fund
5.13%5.50%5.19%4.18%2.19%2.53%2.95%3.65%2.74%2.95%3.71%2.99%

Drawdowns

WACPX vs. FTBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WACPX drawdown since its inception was -26.54%, which is greater than FTBFX's maximum drawdown of -17.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WACPX and FTBFX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-15.98%
-2.84%
WACPX
FTBFX

Volatility

WACPX vs. FTBFX - Volatility Comparison

Western Asset Core Plus Bond Fund Class I (WACPX) has a higher volatility of 1.49% compared to Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX) at 1.35%. This indicates that WACPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%1.20%1.40%1.60%1.80%2.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.49%
1.35%
WACPX
FTBFX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab