WACPX vs. PTRQX
Compare and contrast key facts about Western Asset Core Plus Bond Fund Class I (WACPX) and PGIM Total Return Bond R6 (PTRQX).
WACPX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jul 8, 1998. PTRQX is managed by PGIM Funds (Prudential). It was launched on Dec 27, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WACPX or PTRQX.
Key characteristics
| WACPX | PTRQX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 3.59% | 5.88% |
| 1Y Return | 11.02% | 12.24% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -3.91% | -1.16% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -0.35% | 0.98% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 2.12% | 2.75% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.29 | 1.97 |
| Daily Std Dev | 8.17% | 6.05% |
| Max Drawdown | -25.58% | -20.20% |
| Current Drawdown | -11.84% | -4.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between WACPX and PTRQX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
WACPX vs. PTRQX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, WACPX achieves a 3.59% return, which is significantly lower than PTRQX's 5.88% return. Over the past 10 years, WACPX has underperformed PTRQX with an annualized return of 2.12%, while PTRQX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.75% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WACPX vs. PTRQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WACPX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than PTRQX's 0.39% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WACPX vs. PTRQX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset Core Plus Bond Fund Class I (WACPX) and PGIM Total Return Bond R6 (PTRQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WACPX vs. PTRQX - Dividend Comparison
WACPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, less than PTRQX's 4.71% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WACPX Western Asset Core Plus Bond Fund Class I | 4.47% | 4.23% | 3.48% | 3.35% | 4.12% | 5.01% | 4.04% | 3.31% | 4.77% | 3.18% | 3.45% | 3.21% |
PTRQX PGIM Total Return Bond R6 | 4.71% | 4.70% | 5.23% | 3.06% | 3.04% | 7.20% | 3.97% | 2.99% | 4.00% | 3.35% | 3.82% | 3.86% |
Drawdowns
WACPX vs. PTRQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WACPX drawdown since its inception was -25.58%, which is greater than PTRQX's maximum drawdown of -20.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WACPX and PTRQX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WACPX vs. PTRQX - Volatility Comparison
Western Asset Core Plus Bond Fund Class I (WACPX) has a higher volatility of 1.23% compared to PGIM Total Return Bond R6 (PTRQX) at 0.94%. This indicates that WACPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTRQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.