PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VYMI vs. RFDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VYMI vs. RFDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VYMI achieves a 11.99% return, which is significantly lower than RFDA's 12.65% return.


VYMI

1D
0.61%
1M
1.65%
YTD
11.99%
6M
15.12%
1Y
30.78%
3Y*
22.30%
5Y*
12.09%
10Y*
10.47%

RFDA

1D
1.12%
1M
4.60%
YTD
12.65%
6M
13.45%
1Y
31.38%
3Y*
19.75%
5Y*
13.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VYMI vs. RFDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VYMI
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF
11.99%38.05%7.06%17.07%-7.02%15.39%-1.11%18.43%-12.65%22.36%
RFDA
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF
12.65%16.42%20.12%16.98%-8.58%25.94%11.26%27.15%-9.27%19.86%

Correlation

The correlation between VYMI and RFDA is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2016

0.70

The correlation between VYMI and RFDA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

VYMI vs. RFDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VYMI
RFDA

Financial Services

41.9%
14.7%

Energy

9.5%
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.0%
7.6%

Basic Materials

6.8%
1.8%

Healthcare

6.6%
8.8%

Industrials

6.6%
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

6.5%
7.0%

Utilities

5.6%
5.0%

Technology

4.3%
19.9%

Communication Services

4.0%
8.8%

Real Estate

1.3%
5.0%

Financial Services

VYMI
41.9%
RFDA
14.7%

Energy

VYMI
9.5%
RFDA
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

VYMI
7.0%
RFDA
7.6%

Basic Materials

VYMI
6.8%
RFDA
1.8%

Healthcare

VYMI
6.6%
RFDA
8.8%

Industrials

VYMI
6.6%
RFDA
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VYMI
6.5%
RFDA
7.0%

Utilities

VYMI
5.6%
RFDA
5.0%

Technology

VYMI
4.3%
RFDA
19.9%

Communication Services

VYMI
4.0%
RFDA
8.8%

Real Estate

VYMI
1.3%
RFDA
5.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VYMI vs. RFDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VYMI
VYMI Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VYMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYMI Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VYMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYMI Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

RFDA
RFDA Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
RFDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFDA Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
RFDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFDA Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VYMI vs. RFDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VYMIRFDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.50

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

5.79

-2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.01

21.14

-9.13

VYMI vs. RFDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VYMI Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the RFDA Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VYMI and RFDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VYMIRFDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

2.70

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.86

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.80

-0.15

Drawdowns

VYMI vs. RFDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VYMI drawdown since its inception was -40.00%, which is greater than RFDA's maximum drawdown of -34.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VYMI and RFDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VYMIRFDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.00%

-34.60%

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.14%

-5.45%

-4.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.84%

-19.35%

+6.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.05%

-19.35%

-4.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

0.00%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.31%

-3.74%

-2.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

1.49%

+1.08%

Volatility

VYMI vs. RFDA - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI) has a higher volatility of 3.96% compared to RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) at 2.75%. This indicates that VYMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VYMIRFDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.96%

2.75%

+1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.74%

8.53%

+2.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.94%

11.67%

+1.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.84%

15.74%

-0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.87%

16.85%

+0.02%

VYMI vs. RFDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

VYMI has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than RFDA's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

VYMI vs. RFDA - Dividend Comparison

VYMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than RFDA's 1.75% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
RFDA
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF
1.75%1.89%2.23%2.68%3.57%1.44%1.62%1.87%2.44%1.90%0.98%
VYMI
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF
3.42%3.68%4.84%4.58%4.70%4.30%3.22%4.20%4.29%3.21%2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


VYMI and RFDA have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VYMI has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to RFDA (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VYMI dropped -40.00% vs RFDA's -34.60%.

On 5-year performance, RFDA leads with 13.42% vs 12.09% for VYMI. On fees, VYMI is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, RFDA has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RFDA has performed better with a 13.42% return vs 12.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYMI is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for RFDA.

VYMI has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 1.75% for RFDA.

VYMI is categorized as Dividend, while RFDA is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VYMI and 0.52% for RFDA.

RFDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VYMI and RFDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer