PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VYMI vs. QQQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VYMI vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VYMI achieves a 9.77% return, which is significantly higher than QQQI's 8.55% return.


VYMI

1D
-1.98%
1M
-2.36%
YTD
9.77%
6M
12.87%
1Y
27.95%
3Y*
21.16%
5Y*
11.64%
10Y*
10.16%

QQQI

1D
-3.97%
1M
0.08%
YTD
8.55%
6M
7.71%
1Y
25.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VYMI vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
VYMI
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF
9.77%38.05%7.74%
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
8.55%18.62%19.83%

Correlation

The correlation between VYMI and QQQI is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2024

0.51

The correlation between VYMI and QQQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

VYMI vs. QQQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VYMI
QQQI

Financial Services

41.9%
0.3%

Energy

9.5%
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

7.0%
7.7%

Basic Materials

6.8%
1.2%

Healthcare

6.6%
4.3%

Industrials

6.6%
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

6.5%
12.1%

Utilities

5.6%
1.5%

Technology

4.3%
53.3%

Communication Services

4.0%
15.7%

Real Estate

1.3%
0.1%

Financial Services

VYMI
41.9%
QQQI
0.3%

Energy

VYMI
9.5%
QQQI
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

VYMI
7.0%
QQQI
7.7%

Basic Materials

VYMI
6.8%
QQQI
1.2%

Healthcare

VYMI
6.6%
QQQI
4.3%

Industrials

VYMI
6.6%
QQQI
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VYMI
6.5%
QQQI
12.1%

Utilities

VYMI
5.6%
QQQI
1.5%

Technology

VYMI
4.3%
QQQI
53.3%

Communication Services

VYMI
4.0%
QQQI
15.7%

Real Estate

VYMI
1.3%
QQQI
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VYMI vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VYMI
VYMI Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VYMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYMI Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
VYMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYMI Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQI
QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VYMI vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VYMIQQQIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.35

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

2.64

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.88

11.74

-0.86

VYMI vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VYMI Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VYMI and QQQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VYMIQQQIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

1.87

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

1.18

-0.54

Drawdowns

VYMI vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VYMI drawdown since its inception was -40.00%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VYMI and QQQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VYMIQQQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.00%

-20.00%

-20.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.14%

-9.61%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.76%

-4.47%

+1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.31%

-2.20%

-4.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

2.15%

+0.43%

Volatility

VYMI vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI) is 3.93%, while NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a volatility of 4.92%. This indicates that VYMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VYMIQQQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

4.92%

-0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.94%

10.68%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.10%

13.61%

-0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.86%

17.25%

-2.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.88%

17.25%

-0.37%

VYMI vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

VYMI has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

VYMI vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

VYMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than QQQI's 13.79% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
13.79%13.82%12.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VYMI
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF
3.49%3.68%4.84%4.58%4.70%4.30%3.22%4.20%4.29%3.21%2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


VYMI and QQQI have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQI has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to VYMI (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VYMI dropped -40.00% vs QQQI's -20.00%.

On 1-year performance, VYMI leads with 27.95% vs 25.24% for QQQI. On fees, VYMI is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VYMI has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VYMI has performed better with a 27.95% return vs 25.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYMI is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQI.

QQQI has the higher dividend yield at 13.79%, compared with 3.49% for VYMI.

VYMI is categorized as Dividend, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VYMI and 0.68% for QQQI.

VYMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VYMI and QQQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer