PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VYM vs. LHYAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VYM vs. LHYAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and Lord Abbett High Yield Fund (LHYAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VYM achieves a 11.57% return, which is significantly higher than LHYAX's 1.54% return. Over the past 10 years, VYM has outperformed LHYAX with an annualized return of 11.78%, while LHYAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.52% annualized return.


VYM

1D
0.07%
1M
1.56%
YTD
11.57%
6M
11.72%
1Y
25.29%
3Y*
17.42%
5Y*
12.42%
10Y*
11.78%

LHYAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.73%
YTD
1.54%
6M
2.32%
1Y
7.44%
3Y*
7.49%
5Y*
2.23%
10Y*
4.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VYM vs. LHYAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
11.57%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%
LHYAX
Lord Abbett High Yield Fund
1.54%7.44%7.25%9.84%-14.97%6.16%4.56%15.11%-5.10%8.53%

Correlation

The correlation between VYM and LHYAX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2006

0.40

The correlation between VYM and LHYAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VYM vs. LHYAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

LHYAX
LHYAX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
LHYAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LHYAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
LHYAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
LHYAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
LHYAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VYM vs. LHYAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) and Lord Abbett High Yield Fund (LHYAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VYMLHYAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.47

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

2.48

+1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.13

11.07

+3.06

VYM vs. LHYAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VYM Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the LHYAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VYM and LHYAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VYM vs. LHYAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VYM drawdown since its inception was -56.98%, which is greater than LHYAX's maximum drawdown of -31.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VYM and LHYAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VYMLHYAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.98%

-31.68%

-25.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.69%

-3.02%

-3.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.46%

-4.87%

-9.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.84%

-18.67%

+2.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

-24.23%

-10.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-0.32%

-0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.18%

-3.07%

-4.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

0.67%

+1.12%

Volatility

VYM vs. LHYAX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) has a higher volatility of 3.06% compared to Lord Abbett High Yield Fund (LHYAX) at 0.97%. This indicates that VYM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LHYAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VYMLHYAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

0.97%

+2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.65%

2.82%

+4.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.39%

3.67%

+6.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.95%

5.09%

+8.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.35%

5.73%

+10.62%

VYM vs. LHYAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VYM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than LHYAX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

VYM vs. LHYAX - Dividend Comparison

VYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, less than LHYAX's 7.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LHYAX
Lord Abbett High Yield Fund
7.22%7.13%6.02%5.84%4.60%4.91%5.15%5.47%6.29%5.65%5.85%6.08%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.84%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


VYM and LHYAX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VYM has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to LHYAX (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VYM dropped -56.98% vs LHYAX's -31.68%.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VYM and LHYAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer