VXUS vs. IGF
VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) and IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VXUS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index, while IGF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VXUS returned 10.05%/yr vs 8.53%/yr for IGF. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VXUS charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGF.
Performance
VXUS vs. IGF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VXUS achieves a 13.24% return, which is significantly higher than IGF's 8.95% return. Over the past 10 years, VXUS has outperformed IGF with an annualized return of 10.05%, while IGF has yielded a comparatively lower 8.53% annualized return.
VXUS
- 1D
- 3.33%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- YTD
- 13.24%
- 6M
- 14.27%
- 1Y
- 28.59%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 8.24%
- 10Y*
- 10.05%
IGF
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- YTD
- 8.95%
- 6M
- 9.24%
- 1Y
- 16.47%
- 3Y*
- 16.15%
- 5Y*
- 10.07%
- 10Y*
- 8.53%
VXUS vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 13.24% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | -16.08% | 8.98% | 10.66% | 21.75% | -14.43% | 27.46% |
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 8.95% | 21.31% | 14.81% | 6.14% | -1.26% | 11.57% | -6.50% | 25.82% | -9.95% | 19.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between VXUS and IGF is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2011 | 0.79 |
The correlation between VXUS and IGF shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VXUS vs. IGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VXUS
IGF
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
VXUS
IGF
-
Technology
VXUS
IGF
-
Industrials
VXUS
IGF
Consumer Cyclical
VXUS
IGF
-
Basic Materials
VXUS
IGF
-
Healthcare
VXUS
IGF
-
Energy
VXUS
IGF
Consumer Defensive
VXUS
IGF
-
Communication Services
VXUS
IGF
-
Utilities
VXUS
IGF
Real Estate
VXUS
IGF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VXUS vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank
VXUS
IGF
VXUS vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VXUS | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.28 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | 2.82 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.77 | 8.14 | +1.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VXUS vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VXUS drawdown since its inception was -35.97%, smaller than the maximum IGF drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VXUS and IGF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VXUS | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.97% | -58.33% | +22.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.27% | -5.87% | -5.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.58% | -14.28% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.44% | -20.83% | -8.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.97% | -42.11% | +6.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.86% | -3.63% | +1.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -11.86% | +3.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 2.03% | +0.90% |
Volatility
VXUS vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) at 3.81%. This indicates that VXUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VXUS | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.78% | 3.81% | +2.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.05% | 8.71% | +5.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.09% | 10.57% | +5.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.21% | 14.00% | +2.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.20% | 16.83% | +0.37% |
VXUS vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
VXUS has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
VXUS vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison
VXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than IGF's 2.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.96% | 3.23% | 3.21% | 3.36% | 2.67% | 2.42% | 2.33% | 3.27% | 3.52% | 2.95% | 2.98% | 3.25% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.68% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VXUS and IGF have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VXUS has higher volatility (6.78%) compared to IGF (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VXUS dropped -35.97% vs IGF's -58.33%.
On 10-year performance, VXUS leads with 10.05% vs 8.53% for IGF. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IGF has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 10.05% return vs 8.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGF.
IGF has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 2.68% for VXUS.
VXUS is categorized as Global Equities, while IGF is Industrials Equities. VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index, while IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VXUS and 0.39% for IGF.
VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VXUS and IGF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer