VWO vs. XLU
VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) and XLU (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VWO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index, while XLU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Utilities Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VWO returned 9.00%/yr vs 9.20%/yr for XLU. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.08% expense ratio.
Performance
VWO vs. XLU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 10.77% return, which is significantly higher than XLU's 5.04% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VWO having a 9.00% annualized return and XLU not far ahead at 9.20%.
VWO
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- YTD
- 10.77%
- 6M
- 12.57%
- 1Y
- 26.52%
- 3Y*
- 16.61%
- 5Y*
- 5.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.00%
XLU
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- YTD
- 5.04%
- 6M
- 5.48%
- 1Y
- 12.50%
- 3Y*
- 13.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
VWO vs. XLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 10.77% | 25.60% | 10.59% | 9.25% | -17.98% | 1.26% | 15.17% | 20.75% | -14.76% | 31.49% |
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 5.04% | 16.03% | 23.31% | -7.18% | 1.44% | 17.70% | 0.51% | 25.93% | 3.94% | 12.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between VWO and XLU is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2005 | 0.38 |
The correlation between VWO and XLU shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VWO vs. XLU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VWO
XLU
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
VWO
XLU
-
Financial Services
VWO
XLU
-
Consumer Cyclical
VWO
XLU
-
Industrials
VWO
XLU
-
Basic Materials
VWO
XLU
-
Communication Services
VWO
XLU
-
Energy
VWO
XLU
-
Healthcare
VWO
XLU
-
Consumer Defensive
VWO
XLU
-
Utilities
VWO
XLU
Real Estate
VWO
XLU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VWO vs. XLU — Risk / Return Rank
VWO
XLU
VWO vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VWO | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.15 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 1.30 | +0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.80 | 2.80 | +5.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VWO vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, which is greater than XLU's maximum drawdown of -51.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and XLU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VWO | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.68% | -51.98% | -15.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -9.18% | -1.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.37% | -17.26% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.60% | -25.26% | -7.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.39% | -36.07% | -0.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.68% | -6.05% | +3.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.80% | -10.22% | -5.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 4.25% | -1.08% |
Volatility
VWO vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a higher volatility of 6.64% compared to State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) at 5.59%. This indicates that VWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VWO | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.64% | 5.59% | +1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.04% | 11.68% | +2.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.54% | 14.66% | +1.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.48% | 17.34% | +0.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.22% | 19.27% | -0.05% |
VWO vs. XLU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VWO and XLU have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VWO vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison
VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than XLU's 2.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 2.44% | 2.79% | 3.20% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.23% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% |
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.67% | 2.71% | 2.96% | 3.39% | 2.92% | 2.79% | 3.14% | 2.95% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.41% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VWO and XLU have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VWO has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to XLU (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs XLU's -51.98%.
On 10-year performance, XLU leads with 9.20% vs 9.00% for VWO. Both ETFs have the same 0.08% expense ratio. On volatility, XLU has been the lower-risk option at 5.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLU has performed better with a 9.20% return vs 9.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VWO and XLU have the same expense ratio: 0.08% per year.
XLU has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 2.44% for VWO.
VWO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while XLU is Utilities Equities. VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street.
VWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VWO and XLU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer