VWO vs. SMH
VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VWO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VWO returned 9.00%/yr vs 37.49%/yr for SMH. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VWO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
VWO vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 10.77% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 72.15% return. Over the past 10 years, VWO has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 9.00%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.49% annualized return.
VWO
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- YTD
- 10.77%
- 6M
- 12.57%
- 1Y
- 26.52%
- 3Y*
- 16.61%
- 5Y*
- 5.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.00%
SMH
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 7.20%
- YTD
- 72.15%
- 6M
- 75.62%
- 1Y
- 141.99%
- 3Y*
- 60.05%
- 5Y*
- 38.42%
- 10Y*
- 37.49%
VWO vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 10.77% | 25.60% | 10.59% | 9.25% | -17.98% | 1.26% | 15.17% | 20.75% | -14.76% | 31.49% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 72.15% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between VWO and SMH is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2005 | 0.63 |
The correlation between VWO and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (3 years) to 0.72 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VWO vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VWO
SMH
Technology
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
VWO
SMH
Financial Services
VWO
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
VWO
SMH
-
Industrials
VWO
SMH
-
Basic Materials
VWO
SMH
-
Communication Services
VWO
SMH
-
Energy
VWO
SMH
-
Healthcare
VWO
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
VWO
SMH
-
Utilities
VWO
SMH
-
Real Estate
VWO
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VWO vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
VWO
SMH
VWO vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VWO | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.60 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 9.18 | -6.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.80 | 33.74 | -25.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VWO vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VWO | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.68% | -84.96% | +17.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -14.93% | +3.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.37% | -35.74% | +18.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.60% | -45.30% | +12.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.39% | -45.30% | +8.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.68% | -2.81% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.80% | -41.04% | +25.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 4.06% | -0.89% |
Volatility
VWO vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) is 6.64%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 16.25%. This indicates that VWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VWO | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.64% | 16.25% | -9.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.04% | 27.73% | -13.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.54% | 33.20% | -16.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.48% | 35.47% | -17.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.22% | 32.82% | -13.60% |
VWO vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
VWO vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 2.44% | 2.79% | 3.20% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.23% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VWO and SMH have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (16.25%) compared to VWO (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 37.49% vs 9.00% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VWO has been the lower-risk option at 6.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.49% return vs 9.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.
VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.
VWO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VWO and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer