PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWO vs. SCHF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWO vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 10.77% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 15.39% return. Over the past 10 years, VWO has underperformed SCHF with an annualized return of 9.00%, while SCHF has yielded a comparatively higher 10.82% annualized return.


VWO

1D
0.76%
1M
-0.68%
YTD
10.77%
6M
12.57%
1Y
26.52%
3Y*
16.61%
5Y*
5.03%
10Y*
9.00%

SCHF

1D
0.29%
1M
1.69%
YTD
15.39%
6M
17.24%
1Y
31.75%
3Y*
19.18%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
10.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWO vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
10.77%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%20.75%-14.76%31.49%
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
15.39%34.55%3.28%18.35%-14.80%11.40%9.48%22.26%-14.29%26.03%

Correlation

The correlation between VWO and SCHF is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009

0.81

The correlation between VWO and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

VWO vs. SCHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VWO
SCHF

Technology

29.6%
17.6%

Financial Services

19.5%
23.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
7.3%

Industrials

8.0%
18.1%

Basic Materials

8.0%
7.4%

Communication Services

7.1%
3.6%

Energy

4.6%
4.7%

Healthcare

3.9%
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
5.7%

Utilities

2.9%
3.2%

Real Estate

2.2%
2.0%

Technology

VWO
29.6%
SCHF
17.6%

Financial Services

VWO
19.5%
SCHF
23.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VWO
10.7%
SCHF
7.3%

Industrials

VWO
8.0%
SCHF
18.1%

Basic Materials

VWO
8.0%
SCHF
7.4%

Communication Services

VWO
7.1%
SCHF
3.6%

Energy

VWO
4.6%
SCHF
4.7%

Healthcare

VWO
3.9%
SCHF
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

VWO
3.7%
SCHF
5.7%

Utilities

VWO
2.9%
SCHF
3.2%

Real Estate

VWO
2.2%
SCHF
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWO vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHF
SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWO vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VWOSCHFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.33

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

2.64

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.80

10.14

-2.34

VWO vs. SCHF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the SCHF Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWO and SCHF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VWO vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and SCHF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWOSCHFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.68%

-34.87%

-32.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-11.48%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.37%

-13.41%

-3.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.60%

-29.14%

-3.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.39%

-34.87%

-1.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.68%

-1.00%

-1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.80%

-7.37%

-8.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

2.99%

+0.18%

Volatility

VWO vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) have volatilities of 6.64% and 6.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWOSCHFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.64%

6.91%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.04%

14.42%

-0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.54%

16.67%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.48%

16.56%

+0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.22%

17.24%

+1.98%

VWO vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VWO vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison

VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than SCHF's 2.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
2.96%3.42%3.26%2.97%2.80%3.19%2.08%2.95%3.06%2.35%2.58%2.26%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.44%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWO and SCHF have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHF has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to VWO (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs SCHF's -34.87%.

On 10-year performance, SCHF leads with 10.82% vs 9.00% for VWO. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VWO has been the lower-risk option at 6.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHF has performed better with a 10.82% return vs 9.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VWO.

SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 2.44% for VWO.

VWO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SCHF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.06% for SCHF.

SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWO and SCHF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer