VWO vs. GDX
VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) and GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VWO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index, while GDX is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VWO returned 9.00%/yr vs 13.29%/yr for GDX. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VWO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for GDX.
Performance
VWO vs. GDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 10.77% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -6.69% return. Over the past 10 years, VWO has underperformed GDX with an annualized return of 9.00%, while GDX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.29% annualized return.
VWO
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- YTD
- 10.77%
- 6M
- 12.57%
- 1Y
- 24.61%
- 3Y*
- 16.61%
- 5Y*
- 5.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.00%
GDX
- 1D
- 2.97%
- 1M
- -16.83%
- YTD
- -6.69%
- 6M
- -5.89%
- 1Y
- 50.59%
- 3Y*
- 38.96%
- 5Y*
- 17.51%
- 10Y*
- 13.29%
VWO vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 10.77% | 25.60% | 10.59% | 9.25% | -17.98% | 1.26% | 15.17% | 20.75% | -14.76% | 31.49% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -6.69% | 154.77% | 10.63% | 9.98% | -9.01% | -9.52% | 23.66% | 39.84% | -8.77% | 11.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between VWO and GDX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2006 | 0.36 |
The correlation between VWO and GDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (10 years) to 0.49 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VWO vs. GDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VWO
GDX
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
VWO
GDX
-
Financial Services
VWO
GDX
-
Consumer Cyclical
VWO
GDX
-
Industrials
VWO
GDX
-
Basic Materials
VWO
GDX
Communication Services
VWO
GDX
-
Energy
VWO
GDX
-
Healthcare
VWO
GDX
-
Consumer Defensive
VWO
GDX
-
Utilities
VWO
GDX
-
Real Estate
VWO
GDX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VWO vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank
VWO
GDX
VWO vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VWO | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.21 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 1.40 | +0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.80 | 3.87 | +3.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VWO vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and GDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VWO | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.68% | -80.34% | +12.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -36.28% | +25.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.37% | -36.28% | +18.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.60% | -46.51% | +13.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.39% | -49.79% | +13.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.68% | -30.91% | +28.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.80% | -40.41% | +24.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 13.11% | -9.94% |
Volatility
VWO vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) is 6.64%, while VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a volatility of 17.20%. This indicates that VWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VWO | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.64% | 17.20% | -10.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.04% | 39.15% | -25.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.54% | 46.89% | -30.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.48% | 36.74% | -19.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.22% | 37.34% | -18.12% |
VWO vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
VWO vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison
VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, more than GDX's 0.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.79% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 2.44% | 2.79% | 3.20% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.23% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VWO and GDX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDX has higher volatility (17.20%) compared to VWO (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs GDX's -80.34%.
On 10-year performance, GDX leads with 13.29% vs 9.00% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VWO has been the lower-risk option at 6.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GDX has performed better with a 13.29% return vs 9.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for GDX.
VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 0.79% for GDX.
VWO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while GDX is Gold. VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.51% for GDX.
VWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VWO and GDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer