PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWO vs. FDEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWO vs. FDEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 12.22% return, which is significantly lower than FDEM's 22.58% return.


VWO

1D
-1.41%
1M
2.72%
YTD
12.22%
6M
13.79%
1Y
30.72%
3Y*
18.02%
5Y*
5.17%
10Y*
8.85%

FDEM

1D
-1.46%
1M
7.69%
YTD
22.58%
6M
24.26%
1Y
45.52%
3Y*
23.79%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWO vs. FDEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
12.22%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%10.54%
FDEM
Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF
22.58%26.75%9.34%17.26%-13.11%-3.52%8.87%5.73%

Correlation

The correlation between VWO and FDEM is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2019

0.90

The correlation between VWO and FDEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

VWO vs. FDEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VWO
FDEM

Technology

29.6%
31.8%

Financial Services

19.5%
16.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
12.2%

Industrials

8.0%
4.8%

Basic Materials

8.0%
3.2%

Communication Services

7.1%
10.6%

Energy

4.6%
8.3%

Healthcare

3.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
7.6%

Utilities

2.9%

-

Real Estate

2.2%
5.2%

Technology

VWO
29.6%
FDEM
31.8%

Financial Services

VWO
19.5%
FDEM
16.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VWO
10.7%
FDEM
12.2%

Industrials

VWO
8.0%
FDEM
4.8%

Basic Materials

VWO
8.0%
FDEM
3.2%

Communication Services

VWO
7.1%
FDEM
10.6%

Energy

VWO
4.6%
FDEM
8.3%

Healthcare

VWO
3.9%
FDEM

-

Consumer Defensive

VWO
3.7%
FDEM
7.6%

Utilities

VWO
2.9%
FDEM

-

Real Estate

VWO
2.2%
FDEM
5.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWO vs. FDEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

FDEM
FDEM Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FDEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FDEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWO vs. FDEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VWOFDEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.48

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

3.60

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.96

14.12

-4.16

VWO vs. FDEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the FDEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWO and FDEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VWOFDEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

2.63

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.59

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.53

-0.26

Drawdowns

VWO vs. FDEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, which is greater than FDEM's maximum drawdown of -33.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and FDEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWOFDEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.68%

-33.65%

-34.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-12.70%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.37%

-16.04%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.64%

-29.02%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-1.46%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.82%

-8.84%

-6.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

3.23%

-0.14%

Volatility

VWO vs. FDEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) is 5.61%, while Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) has a volatility of 7.26%. This indicates that VWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWOFDEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.61%

7.26%

-1.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.22%

15.03%

-1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.89%

17.36%

-1.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.37%

16.13%

+1.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.20%

17.91%

+1.29%

VWO vs. FDEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FDEM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

VWO vs. FDEM - Dividend Comparison

VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, less than FDEM's 2.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDEM
Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF
2.66%3.23%4.05%4.41%3.95%2.71%1.84%2.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.40%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VWO and FDEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDEM has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to VWO (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs FDEM's -33.65%.

On 5-year performance, FDEM leads with 9.43% vs 5.17% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VWO has been the lower-risk option at 5.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDEM has performed better with a 9.43% return vs 5.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDEM.

FDEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 2.40% for VWO.

VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while FDEM tracks Fidelity Targeted Emerging Markets Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.45% for FDEM.

FDEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWO and FDEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer