PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWO vs. EMDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWO vs. EMDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 9.99% return, which is significantly lower than EMDM's 28.39% return.


VWO

1D
0.53%
1M
0.03%
6M
4.14%
YTD
9.99%
1Y
22.33%
3Y*
15.67%
5Y*
5.92%
10Y*
7.69%
ALL TIME*
6.83%

EMDM

1D
0.42%
1M
-3.12%
6M
12.42%
YTD
28.39%
1Y
66.69%
3Y*
28.08%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
26.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$370.33K$752.09K$541.22K
$402.91M$469.57M$503.00M

VWO vs. EMDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
9.99%25.60%10.59%5.44%
EMDM
First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF
28.39%59.68%-4.93%14.75%

Correlation

The correlation between VWO and EMDM is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2023

0.85

The correlation between VWO and EMDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

VWO vs. EMDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VWO
EMDM

Technology

34.2%
39.9%

Financial Services

19.4%
25.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
5.3%

Industrials

7.9%
2.6%

Basic Materials

7.2%
12.7%

Communication Services

6.6%
4.0%

Energy

3.8%
4.8%

Healthcare

3.7%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
3.1%

Utilities

2.8%
1.5%

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Technology

VWO
34.2%
EMDM
39.9%

Financial Services

VWO
19.4%
EMDM
25.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VWO
9.1%
EMDM
5.3%

Industrials

VWO
7.9%
EMDM
2.6%

Basic Materials

VWO
7.2%
EMDM
12.7%

Communication Services

VWO
6.6%
EMDM
4.0%

Energy

VWO
3.8%
EMDM
4.8%

Healthcare

VWO
3.7%
EMDM
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

VWO
3.3%
EMDM
3.1%

Utilities

VWO
2.8%
EMDM
1.5%

Real Estate

VWO
2.0%
EMDM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWO vs. EMDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

EMDM
EMDM Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
EMDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMDM Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
EMDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMDM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VWO vs. EMDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VWOEMDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.42

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

4.28

-2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.52

13.58

-7.06

VWO vs. EMDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the EMDM Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWO and EMDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VWO vs. EMDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, which is greater than EMDM's maximum drawdown of -18.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and EMDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWOEMDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.68%

-18.81%

-48.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-15.65%

+4.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.37%

-18.81%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.56%

-10.51%

+6.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.73%

-4.21%

-11.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

4.93%

-1.50%

Volatility

VWO vs. EMDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) is 5.60%, while First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) has a volatility of 9.92%. This indicates that VWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWOEMDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.60%

9.92%

-4.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.08%

25.36%

-10.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.60%

27.91%

-10.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.56%

21.15%

-3.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.17%

21.15%

-1.98%

VWO vs. EMDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than EMDM's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

VWO vs. EMDM - Dividend Comparison

VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, less than EMDM's 2.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMDM
First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF
2.95%3.57%5.87%2.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.34%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWO and EMDM have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMDM has higher volatility (9.92%) compared to VWO (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs EMDM's -18.81%.

On 3-year performance, EMDM leads with 28.08% vs 15.67% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VWO has been the lower-risk option at 5.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, EMDM has performed better with a 28.08% return vs 15.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EMDM.

EMDM has the higher dividend yield at 2.95%, compared with 2.34% for VWO.

VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while EMDM tracks Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.75% for EMDM.

EMDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWO and EMDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer