VVSGX vs. HSPGX
VVSGX (VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund) and HSPGX (Emerald Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, VVSGX returned 12.47%/yr vs 32.40%/yr for HSPGX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VVSGX charges 0.88%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for HSPGX.
Performance
VVSGX vs. HSPGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VVSGX achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly lower than HSPGX's 26.02% return.
VVSGX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- 11.32%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 22.46%
- 3Y*
- 12.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HSPGX
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- 7.31%
- YTD
- 26.02%
- 6M
- 24.44%
- 1Y
- 68.10%
- 3Y*
- 32.40%
- 5Y*
- 13.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.13%
VVSGX vs. HSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VVSGX VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund | 11.32% | 8.99% | 10.85% | 14.20% | -32.21% | -3.59% |
HSPGX Emerald Growth Fund | 26.02% | 31.62% | 28.04% | 18.66% | -24.65% | -1.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between VVSGX and HSPGX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2021 | 0.94 |
The correlation between VVSGX and HSPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VVSGX vs. HSPGX — Risk / Return Rank
VVSGX
HSPGX
VVSGX vs. HSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund (VVSGX) and Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VVSGX | HSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.22 | 2.89 | -1.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.83 | 3.55 | -1.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.45 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 5.07 | -3.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.35 | 21.39 | -14.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VVSGX | HSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 2.89 | -1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.44 | -0.44 |
Drawdowns
VVSGX vs. HSPGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VVSGX drawdown since its inception was -44.74%, smaller than the maximum HSPGX drawdown of -60.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VVSGX and HSPGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VVSGX | HSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.74% | -60.28% | +15.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.47% | -14.41% | +1.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.74% | -28.63% | +2.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.09% | 0.00% | -7.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.82% | -19.01% | -5.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | 3.39% | -0.09% |
Volatility
VVSGX vs. HSPGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund (VVSGX) is 6.31%, while Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) has a volatility of 7.62%. This indicates that VVSGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VVSGX | HSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.31% | 7.62% | -1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.08% | 19.24% | -4.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.94% | 25.33% | -5.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.02% | 25.45% | -0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.02% | 25.13% | -0.11% |
VVSGX vs. HSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VVSGX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than HSPGX's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
VVSGX vs. HSPGX - Dividend Comparison
VVSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than HSPGX's 10.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSPGX Emerald Growth Fund | 10.11% | 12.74% | 21.85% | 6.43% | 8.77% | 19.11% | 8.48% | 1.45% | 11.86% |
VVSGX VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund | 2.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.74% | 10.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, VVSGX and HSPGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
HSPGX has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to VVSGX (6.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VVSGX dropped -44.74% vs HSPGX's -60.28%.
HSPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VVSGX and HSPGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer