HSPGX vs. VRTGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX).
HSPGX is managed by Emerald. It was launched on Oct 1, 1992. VRTGX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on May 25, 2011.
Performance
HSPGX vs. VRTGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HSPGX vs. VRTGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSPGX Emerald Growth Fund | -5.91% | 31.62% | 28.04% | 18.66% | -24.65% | 3.59% | 38.49% | 28.33% | -12.16% | 27.72% |
VRTGX Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares | -6.77% | 12.97% | 15.26% | 18.80% | -26.30% | 2.82% | 34.81% | 28.84% | -9.21% | 22.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSPGX achieves a -5.91% return, which is significantly higher than VRTGX's -6.77% return. Over the past 10 years, HSPGX has outperformed VRTGX with an annualized return of 13.12%, while VRTGX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.37% annualized return.
HSPGX
- 1D
- -3.18%
- 1M
- -12.33%
- YTD
- -5.91%
- 6M
- -0.33%
- 1Y
- 41.44%
- 3Y*
- 21.83%
- 5Y*
- 7.28%
- 10Y*
- 13.12%
VRTGX
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- -10.13%
- YTD
- -6.77%
- 6M
- -5.62%
- 1Y
- 18.63%
- 3Y*
- 10.77%
- 5Y*
- 0.82%
- 10Y*
- 9.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HSPGX vs. VRTGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSPGX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTGX's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HSPGX vs. VRTGX — Risk / Return Rank
HSPGX
VRTGX
HSPGX vs. VRTGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HSPGX | VRTGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.40 | 0.71 | +0.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.95 | 1.15 | +0.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.14 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 1.02 | +1.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.85 | 3.52 | +5.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HSPGX | VRTGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 0.71 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.03 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.39 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.45 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between HSPGX and VRTGX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HSPGX vs. VRTGX - Dividend Comparison
HSPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.54%, more than VRTGX's 0.77% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSPGX Emerald Growth Fund | 13.54% | 12.74% | 21.85% | 6.43% | 8.77% | 19.11% | 8.48% | 1.45% | 11.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VRTGX Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares | 0.77% | 0.57% | 0.62% | 0.85% | 0.78% | 0.54% | 0.53% | 0.90% | 0.85% | 0.75% | 1.07% | 0.84% |
Drawdowns
HSPGX vs. VRTGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSPGX drawdown since its inception was -60.28%, which is greater than VRTGX's maximum drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSPGX and VRTGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSPGX | VRTGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.28% | -41.97% | -18.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.38% | -14.80% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.65% | -40.48% | +1.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.48% | -41.97% | +0.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.41% | -14.80% | +0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.10% | -10.53% | -8.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.07% | 4.30% | -0.23% |
Volatility
HSPGX vs. VRTGX - Volatility Comparison
Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) has a higher volatility of 9.85% compared to Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX) at 7.60%. This indicates that HSPGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRTGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HSPGX | VRTGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.85% | 7.60% | +2.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.39% | 16.04% | +3.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.73% | 25.09% | +3.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.15% | 24.47% | +0.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.92% | 24.41% | +0.51% |