HSPGX vs. FGROX
Compare and contrast key facts about Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) and Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX).
HSPGX is managed by Emerald. It was launched on Oct 1, 1992. FGROX is a passively managed fund by Emerald that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Growth Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2008.
Performance
HSPGX vs. FGROX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HSPGX vs. FGROX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSPGX Emerald Growth Fund | -0.71% | 31.62% | 28.04% | 18.66% | -24.65% | 3.59% | 38.49% | 28.33% | -12.16% | 27.72% |
FGROX Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class | -0.63% | 31.85% | 20.04% | 19.04% | -24.42% | 3.91% | 38.92% | 28.71% | -11.85% | 28.11% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSPGX achieves a -0.71% return, which is significantly lower than FGROX's -0.63% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HSPGX having a 13.73% annualized return and FGROX not far behind at 13.31%.
HSPGX
- 1D
- 5.53%
- 1M
- -8.93%
- YTD
- -0.71%
- 6M
- 4.94%
- 1Y
- 49.48%
- 3Y*
- 24.04%
- 5Y*
- 7.93%
- 10Y*
- 13.73%
FGROX
- 1D
- 5.54%
- 1M
- -8.90%
- YTD
- -0.63%
- 6M
- 5.05%
- 1Y
- 49.73%
- 3Y*
- 21.60%
- 5Y*
- 6.78%
- 10Y*
- 13.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HSPGX vs. FGROX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSPGX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than FGROX's 0.78% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HSPGX vs. FGROX — Risk / Return Rank
HSPGX
FGROX
HSPGX vs. FGROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) and Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HSPGX | FGROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.71 | 1.71 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.30 | 2.31 | -0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.31 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 2.88 | -0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.16 | 11.28 | -0.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HSPGX | FGROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.71 | 1.71 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.27 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.53 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.46 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between HSPGX and FGROX is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HSPGX vs. FGROX - Dividend Comparison
HSPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.83%, more than FGROX's 11.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSPGX Emerald Growth Fund | 12.83% | 12.74% | 21.85% | 6.43% | 8.77% | 19.11% | 8.48% | 1.45% | 11.86% |
FGROX Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class | 11.46% | 11.39% | 13.92% | 5.91% | 8.13% | 17.87% | 8.04% | 1.38% | 11.36% |
Drawdowns
HSPGX vs. FGROX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSPGX drawdown since its inception was -60.28%, which is greater than FGROX's maximum drawdown of -41.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSPGX and FGROX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSPGX | FGROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.28% | -41.48% | -18.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.38% | -15.38% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.65% | -38.52% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.48% | -41.48% | 0.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.67% | -9.61% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.10% | -10.33% | -8.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.95% | 3.93% | +0.02% |
Volatility
HSPGX vs. FGROX - Volatility Comparison
Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) and Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX) have volatilities of 11.36% and 11.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HSPGX | FGROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.36% | 11.38% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.12% | 20.13% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.18% | 29.20% | -0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.26% | 25.38% | -0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.98% | 25.04% | -0.06% |