PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VVSGX vs. ETMGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VVSGX vs. ETMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund (VVSGX) and Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund (ETMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VVSGX achieves a 15.55% return, which is significantly higher than ETMGX's 8.51% return.


VVSGX

1D
2.25%
1M
-2.63%
6M
14.51%
YTD
15.55%
1Y
24.71%
3Y*
10.59%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.81%

ETMGX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.43%
6M
4.68%
YTD
8.51%
1Y
8.28%
3Y*
3.91%
5Y*
2.27%
10Y*
8.11%
ALL TIME*
9.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

VVSGX vs. ETMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VVSGX
VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund
15.55%8.99%10.85%14.20%-32.21%-3.59%
ETMGX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund
8.51%-6.63%11.43%11.06%-16.53%6.38%

Correlation

The correlation between VVSGX and ETMGX is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2021

0.85

The correlation between VVSGX and ETMGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VVSGX vs. ETMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VVSGX
VVSGX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
VVSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VVSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
VVSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
VVSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
VVSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

ETMGX
ETMGX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
ETMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
ETMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VVSGX vs. ETMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund (VVSGX) and Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund (ETMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VVSGXETMGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.06

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

0.36

+1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.16

0.81

+5.36

VVSGX vs. ETMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VVSGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is higher than the ETMGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VVSGX and ETMGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VVSGX vs. ETMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VVSGX drawdown since its inception was -44.74%, which is greater than ETMGX's maximum drawdown of -37.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VVSGX and ETMGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VVSGXETMGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.74%

-37.02%

-7.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.47%

-13.14%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.74%

-22.28%

-3.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.74%

-25.14%

-19.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.45%

-6.99%

+2.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.15%

-6.60%

-17.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

5.90%

-2.46%

Volatility

VVSGX vs. ETMGX - Volatility Comparison

VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund (VVSGX) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund (ETMGX) at 4.41%. This indicates that VVSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VVSGXETMGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

4.41%

+0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.47%

11.44%

+5.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.09%

16.43%

+4.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.10%

18.75%

+6.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.94%

19.90%

+5.04%

VVSGX vs. ETMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VVSGX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than ETMGX's 1.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

VVSGX vs. ETMGX - Dividend Comparison

VVSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, less than ETMGX's 6.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETMGX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund
6.49%7.04%2.85%1.36%2.80%8.28%0.09%6.50%7.75%11.87%6.00%5.50%
VVSGX
VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund
2.15%0.00%0.00%7.74%10.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VVSGX and ETMGX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VVSGX has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to ETMGX (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VVSGX dropped -44.74% vs ETMGX's -37.02%.

VVSGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VVSGX and ETMGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer