VVSGX vs. ETMGX
VVSGX (VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund) and ETMGX (Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, VVSGX returned 0.78%/yr vs 2.27%/yr for ETMGX. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. VVSGX charges 0.88%/yr vs 1.11%/yr for ETMGX.
Performance
VVSGX vs. ETMGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VVSGX achieves a 15.55% return, which is significantly higher than ETMGX's 8.51% return.
VVSGX
- 1D
- 2.25%
- 1M
- -2.63%
- 6M
- 14.51%
- YTD
- 15.55%
- 1Y
- 24.71%
- 3Y*
- 10.59%
- 5Y*
- 0.78%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.81%
ETMGX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- 6M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 8.51%
- 1Y
- 8.28%
- 3Y*
- 3.91%
- 5Y*
- 2.27%
- 10Y*
- 8.11%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.26%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
VVSGX vs. ETMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VVSGX VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund | 15.55% | 8.99% | 10.85% | 14.20% | -32.21% | -3.59% |
ETMGX Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund | 8.51% | -6.63% | 11.43% | 11.06% | -16.53% | 6.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between VVSGX and ETMGX is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2021 | 0.85 |
The correlation between VVSGX and ETMGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VVSGX vs. ETMGX — Risk / Return Rank
VVSGX
ETMGX
VVSGX vs. ETMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund (VVSGX) and Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund (ETMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VVSGX | ETMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.06 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 0.36 | +1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.16 | 0.81 | +5.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VVSGX vs. ETMGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VVSGX drawdown since its inception was -44.74%, which is greater than ETMGX's maximum drawdown of -37.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VVSGX and ETMGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VVSGX | ETMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.74% | -37.02% | -7.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.47% | -13.14% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.74% | -22.28% | -3.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.74% | -25.14% | -19.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.45% | -6.99% | +2.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.15% | -6.60% | -17.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 5.90% | -2.46% |
Volatility
VVSGX vs. ETMGX - Volatility Comparison
VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund (VVSGX) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund (ETMGX) at 4.41%. This indicates that VVSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VVSGX | ETMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.34% | 4.41% | +0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.47% | 11.44% | +5.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.09% | 16.43% | +4.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.10% | 18.75% | +6.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.94% | 19.90% | +5.04% |
VVSGX vs. ETMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VVSGX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than ETMGX's 1.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
VVSGX vs. ETMGX - Dividend Comparison
VVSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, less than ETMGX's 6.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETMGX Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund | 6.49% | 7.04% | 2.85% | 1.36% | 2.80% | 8.28% | 0.09% | 6.50% | 7.75% | 11.87% | 6.00% | 5.50% |
VVSGX VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund | 2.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.74% | 10.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VVSGX and ETMGX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VVSGX has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to ETMGX (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VVSGX dropped -44.74% vs ETMGX's -37.02%.
VVSGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VVSGX and ETMGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer