HSPGX vs. HSSAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) and Emerald Finance and Banking Innovation Fund (HSSAX).
HSPGX is managed by Emerald. It was launched on Oct 1, 1992. HSSAX is managed by Emerald. It was launched on Feb 18, 1997.
Performance
HSPGX vs. HSSAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HSPGX vs. HSSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSPGX Emerald Growth Fund | -5.91% | 31.62% | 28.04% | 18.66% | -24.65% | 3.59% | 38.49% | 28.33% | -12.16% | 27.72% |
HSSAX Emerald Finance and Banking Innovation Fund | -12.92% | 12.11% | 16.47% | 15.58% | -55.87% | 38.83% | 11.94% | 20.55% | -19.86% | 12.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSPGX achieves a -5.91% return, which is significantly higher than HSSAX's -12.92% return. Over the past 10 years, HSPGX has outperformed HSSAX with an annualized return of 13.12%, while HSSAX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.11% annualized return.
HSPGX
- 1D
- -3.18%
- 1M
- -12.33%
- YTD
- -5.91%
- 6M
- -0.33%
- 1Y
- 41.44%
- 3Y*
- 21.83%
- 5Y*
- 7.28%
- 10Y*
- 13.12%
HSSAX
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -4.07%
- YTD
- -12.92%
- 6M
- -13.79%
- 1Y
- 0.58%
- 3Y*
- 14.01%
- 5Y*
- -9.52%
- 10Y*
- 3.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HSPGX vs. HSSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSPGX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is lower than HSSAX's 1.71% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HSPGX vs. HSSAX — Risk / Return Rank
HSPGX
HSSAX
HSPGX vs. HSSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) and Emerald Finance and Banking Innovation Fund (HSSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HSPGX | HSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.40 | 0.03 | +1.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.95 | 0.23 | +1.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.03 | +0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | -0.05 | +2.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.85 | -0.12 | +8.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HSPGX | HSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 0.03 | +1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | -0.32 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.11 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.31 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between HSPGX and HSSAX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HSPGX vs. HSSAX - Dividend Comparison
HSPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.54%, while HSSAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSPGX Emerald Growth Fund | 13.54% | 12.74% | 21.85% | 6.43% | 8.77% | 19.11% | 8.48% | 1.45% | 11.86% | 0.00% |
HSSAX Emerald Finance and Banking Innovation Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 26.56% | 2.83% |
Drawdowns
HSPGX vs. HSSAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSPGX drawdown since its inception was -60.28%, smaller than the maximum HSSAX drawdown of -73.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSPGX and HSSAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSPGX | HSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.28% | -73.01% | +12.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.38% | -19.61% | +4.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.65% | -73.01% | +34.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.48% | -73.01% | +31.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.41% | -54.79% | +40.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.10% | -18.77% | -0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.07% | 7.90% | -3.83% |
Volatility
HSPGX vs. HSSAX - Volatility Comparison
Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) has a higher volatility of 9.85% compared to Emerald Finance and Banking Innovation Fund (HSSAX) at 5.95%. This indicates that HSPGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HSPGX | HSSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.85% | 5.95% | +3.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.39% | 19.12% | +0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.73% | 26.90% | +1.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.15% | 29.49% | -4.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.92% | 28.14% | -3.22% |