VVGM.DE vs. IGF
VVGM.DE (VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF) and IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VVGM.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus, while IGF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VVGM.DE returned 7.42%/yr vs 11.09%/yr for IGF. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VVGM.DE charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGF.
Performance
VVGM.DE vs. IGF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VVGM.DE is traded in EUR, while IGF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IGF values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VVGM.DE achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly lower than IGF's 10.65% return.
VVGM.DE
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- 6.85%
- 3Y*
- 10.24%
- 5Y*
- 7.42%
- 10Y*
- —
IGF
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 10.65%
- 6M
- 10.87%
- 1Y
- 15.68%
- 3Y*
- 13.37%
- 5Y*
- 11.09%
- 10Y*
- 8.27%
VVGM.DE vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VVGM.DE VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF | 0.57% | 11.67% | 16.13% | 7.09% | -6.16% | 24.82% | 7.73% |
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 10.65% | 6.91% | 22.39% | 2.96% | 4.86% | 19.92% | 8.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between VVGM.DE and IGF is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2020 | 0.38 |
The correlation between VVGM.DE and IGF shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VVGM.DE vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank
VVGM.DE
IGF
VVGM.DE vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF (VVGM.DE) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VVGM.DE | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.28 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | 3.61 | -2.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.16 | 9.04 | -6.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VVGM.DE vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VVGM.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.74%, smaller than the maximum IGF drawdown of -51.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VVGM.DE and IGF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VVGM.DE | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.74% | -51.30% | +33.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.92% | -4.36% | -6.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.74% | -12.62% | -5.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.74% | -19.21% | +1.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.90% | -2.06% | -2.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.80% | -10.99% | +7.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 1.74% | +1.72% |
Volatility
VVGM.DE vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF (VVGM.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.13% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) at 3.39%. This indicates that VVGM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VVGM.DE | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.13% | 3.39% | +0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.21% | 7.69% | +2.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.66% | 9.79% | +2.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.62% | 12.55% | +1.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.72% | 16.29% | -2.57% |
VVGM.DE vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
VVGM.DE has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
VVGM.DE vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison
VVGM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.96% | 3.23% | 3.21% | 3.36% | 2.67% | 2.42% | 2.33% | 3.27% | 3.52% | 2.95% | 2.98% | 3.25% |
VVGM.DE VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VVGM.DE and IGF have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IGF is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IGF is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for VVGM.DE.
VVGM.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while IGF is Industrials Equities. VVGM.DE tracks Morningstar Global Wide Moat Focus, while IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for VVGM.DE and 0.39% for IGF.
Find the right allocation for VVGM.DE and IGF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer