VV vs. NOLCX
VV (Vanguard Large-Cap ETF) and NOLCX (Northern Large Cap Core Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, VV returned 15.14%/yr vs 14.56%/yr for NOLCX. Their 0.97 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. VV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for NOLCX.
Performance
VV vs. NOLCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VV having a 9.78% return and NOLCX slightly higher at 9.87%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VV having a 15.14% annualized return and NOLCX not far behind at 14.56%.
VV
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 8.54%
- YTD
- 9.78%
- 1Y
- 20.98%
- 3Y*
- 19.53%
- 5Y*
- 12.36%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.97%
NOLCX
- 1D
- 1.70%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 8.54%
- YTD
- 9.87%
- 1Y
- 20.77%
- 3Y*
- 21.00%
- 5Y*
- 14.16%
- 10Y*
- 14.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $85.99M | $75.21M | $96.89M |
VV vs. NOLCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | 9.78% | 18.11% | 25.25% | 27.18% | -19.91% | 27.41% | 21.04% | 31.25% | -4.46% | 22.00% |
NOLCX Northern Large Cap Core Fund | 9.87% | 21.83% | 26.04% | 24.32% | -15.59% | 32.90% | 11.96% | 25.64% | -6.28% | 20.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between VV and NOLCX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2005 | 0.97 |
The correlation between VV and NOLCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.87 (1 year) to 0.97 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VV vs. NOLCX — Risk / Return Rank
VV
NOLCX
VV vs. NOLCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and Northern Large Cap Core Fund (NOLCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VV | NOLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.30 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 2.54 | -0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.71 | 10.81 | -2.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VV vs. NOLCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VV drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, roughly equal to the maximum NOLCX drawdown of -56.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VV and NOLCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VV | NOLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.81% | -56.64% | +1.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.21% | -8.20% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.97% | -19.03% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.66% | -30.63% | +4.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.28% | -34.46% | +0.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.53% | -1.25% | -0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.80% | -8.79% | +1.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | 1.92% | +0.26% |
Volatility
VV vs. NOLCX - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and Northern Large Cap Core Fund (NOLCX) have volatilities of 3.64% and 3.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VV | NOLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.64% | 3.52% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.18% | 9.62% | +0.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.01% | 12.70% | +0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 19.17% | -1.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 19.25% | -1.04% |
VV vs. NOLCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than NOLCX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
VV vs. NOLCX - Dividend Comparison
VV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than NOLCX's 7.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOLCX Northern Large Cap Core Fund | 7.79% | 8.57% | 9.09% | 8.96% | 5.02% | 14.82% | 1.35% | 3.93% | 2.49% | 2.63% | 1.78% | 1.87% |
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | 1.02% | 1.08% | 1.24% | 1.41% | 1.66% | 1.19% | 1.46% | 1.81% | 2.09% | 1.75% | 1.98% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VV and NOLCX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VV has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to NOLCX (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VV dropped -54.81% vs NOLCX's -56.64%.
NOLCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VV and NOLCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer