NOLCX vs. VTHR
NOLCX (Northern Large Cap Core Fund) and VTHR (Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NOLCX returned 15.03%/yr vs 15.22%/yr for VTHR. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NOLCX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VTHR.
Performance
NOLCX vs. VTHR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOLCX achieves a 9.18% return, which is significantly lower than VTHR's 10.18% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NOLCX having a 15.03% annualized return and VTHR not far ahead at 15.22%.
NOLCX
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 9.18%
- 6M
- 8.60%
- 1Y
- 27.99%
- 3Y*
- 22.42%
- 5Y*
- 15.29%
- 10Y*
- 15.03%
VTHR
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 10.18%
- 6M
- 9.37%
- 1Y
- 26.90%
- 3Y*
- 21.03%
- 5Y*
- 12.31%
- 10Y*
- 15.22%
NOLCX vs. VTHR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOLCX Northern Large Cap Core Fund | 9.18% | 21.83% | 26.04% | 24.32% | -15.59% | 32.90% | 11.96% | 25.64% | -6.28% | 20.32% |
VTHR Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF | 10.18% | 16.99% | 23.57% | 25.92% | -19.20% | 25.49% | 20.93% | 30.82% | -5.65% | 21.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOLCX and VTHR is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010 | 0.92 |
The correlation between NOLCX and VTHR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOLCX vs. VTHR — Risk / Return Rank
NOLCX
VTHR
NOLCX vs. VTHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Large Cap Core Fund (NOLCX) and Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NOLCX | VTHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.38 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.49 | 3.03 | +0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.53 | 13.55 | +1.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NOLCX vs. VTHR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOLCX drawdown since its inception was -56.64%, which is greater than VTHR's maximum drawdown of -34.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOLCX and VTHR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOLCX | VTHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.64% | -34.61% | -22.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.20% | -8.91% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.03% | -19.36% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.63% | -25.06% | -5.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.46% | -34.61% | +0.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.48% | -1.38% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.83% | -4.03% | -4.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.83% | 1.99% | -0.16% |
Volatility
NOLCX vs. VTHR - Volatility Comparison
Northern Large Cap Core Fund (NOLCX) and Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) have volatilities of 4.60% and 4.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOLCX | VTHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.60% | 4.58% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.50% | 10.04% | -0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.35% | 12.82% | -0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.17% | 17.38% | +1.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.29% | 17.89% | +1.40% |
NOLCX vs. VTHR - Expense Ratio Comparison
NOLCX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VTHR's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
NOLCX vs. VTHR - Dividend Comparison
NOLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.86%, more than VTHR's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOLCX Northern Large Cap Core Fund | 7.86% | 8.57% | 9.09% | 8.96% | 5.02% | 14.82% | 1.35% | 3.93% | 2.49% | 2.63% | 1.78% | 1.87% |
VTHR Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF | 1.03% | 1.08% | 1.19% | 1.47% | 1.52% | 1.16% | 1.37% | 1.65% | 1.89% | 1.63% | 1.82% | 1.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NOLCX and VTHR have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NOLCX has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to VTHR (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOLCX dropped -56.64% vs VTHR's -34.61%.
NOLCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NOLCX and VTHR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer