PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOLCX vs. NOMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOLCX vs. NOMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Large Cap Core Fund (NOLCX) and Northern Mid Cap Index Fund (NOMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOLCX achieves a 9.18% return, which is significantly lower than NOMIX's 15.38% return. Over the past 10 years, NOLCX has outperformed NOMIX with an annualized return of 15.03%, while NOMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.27% annualized return.


NOLCX

1D
0.93%
1M
0.49%
YTD
9.18%
6M
8.60%
1Y
27.99%
3Y*
22.42%
5Y*
15.29%
10Y*
15.03%

NOMIX

1D
1.14%
1M
3.31%
YTD
15.38%
6M
12.94%
1Y
27.12%
3Y*
15.24%
5Y*
9.16%
10Y*
11.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOLCX vs. NOMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOLCX
Northern Large Cap Core Fund
9.18%21.83%26.04%24.32%-15.59%32.90%11.96%25.64%-6.28%20.32%
NOMIX
Northern Mid Cap Index Fund
15.38%7.45%13.41%16.43%-13.42%24.47%13.59%25.94%-11.31%16.06%

Correlation

The correlation between NOLCX and NOMIX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2005

0.90

The correlation between NOLCX and NOMIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOLCX vs. NOMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOLCX
NOLCX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
NOLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
NOLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

NOMIX
NOMIX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
NOMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
NOMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOLCX vs. NOMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Large Cap Core Fund (NOLCX) and Northern Mid Cap Index Fund (NOMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOLCXNOMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.30

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

3.14

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.53

11.43

+4.10

NOLCX vs. NOMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOLCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the NOMIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOLCX and NOMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOLCX vs. NOMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOLCX drawdown since its inception was -56.64%, roughly equal to the maximum NOMIX drawdown of -55.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOLCX and NOMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOLCXNOMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.64%

-55.44%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.20%

-8.84%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.03%

-24.34%

+5.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.63%

-27.65%

-2.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.46%

-42.03%

+7.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-0.41%

-1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.83%

-7.90%

-0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

2.41%

-0.58%

Volatility

NOLCX vs. NOMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northern Large Cap Core Fund (NOLCX) is 4.60%, while Northern Mid Cap Index Fund (NOMIX) has a volatility of 4.87%. This indicates that NOLCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOLCXNOMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.60%

4.87%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.50%

12.86%

-3.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.35%

16.88%

-4.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.17%

21.33%

-2.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.29%

21.83%

-2.54%

NOLCX vs. NOMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOLCX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than NOMIX's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOLCX vs. NOMIX - Dividend Comparison

NOLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.86%, more than NOMIX's 6.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOLCX
Northern Large Cap Core Fund
7.86%8.57%9.09%8.96%5.02%14.82%1.35%3.93%2.49%2.63%1.78%1.87%
NOMIX
Northern Mid Cap Index Fund
6.01%6.93%9.67%8.01%10.43%10.30%4.80%2.21%9.23%7.46%6.46%8.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOLCX and NOMIX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOMIX has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to NOLCX (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOLCX dropped -56.64% vs NOMIX's -55.44%.

NOLCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOLCX and NOMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer