PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOLCX vs. VONE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOLCX vs. VONE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Large Cap Core Fund (NOLCX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NOLCX having a 9.18% return and VONE slightly higher at 9.48%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NOLCX having a 15.03% annualized return and VONE not far ahead at 15.46%.


NOLCX

1D
0.93%
1M
0.49%
YTD
9.18%
6M
8.60%
1Y
27.99%
3Y*
22.42%
5Y*
15.29%
10Y*
15.03%

VONE

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.31%
YTD
9.48%
6M
9.01%
1Y
25.90%
3Y*
21.09%
5Y*
12.72%
10Y*
15.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOLCX vs. VONE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOLCX
Northern Large Cap Core Fund
9.18%21.83%26.04%24.32%-15.59%32.90%11.96%25.64%-6.28%20.32%
VONE
Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF
9.48%17.21%24.51%26.41%-19.14%26.49%20.95%31.12%-4.84%21.55%

Correlation

The correlation between NOLCX and VONE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.96

The correlation between NOLCX and VONE shifts across timeframes, from 0.86 (1 year) to 0.96 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOLCX vs. VONE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOLCX
NOLCX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
NOLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
NOLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

VONE
VONE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VONE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
VONE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOLCX vs. VONE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Large Cap Core Fund (NOLCX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOLCXVONEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.37

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

2.94

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.53

13.14

+2.39

NOLCX vs. VONE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOLCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the VONE Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOLCX and VONE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOLCX vs. VONE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOLCX drawdown since its inception was -56.64%, which is greater than VONE's maximum drawdown of -34.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOLCX and VONE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOLCXVONEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.64%

-34.66%

-21.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.20%

-8.85%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.03%

-19.06%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.63%

-25.12%

-5.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.46%

-34.66%

+0.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-1.67%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.83%

-3.90%

-4.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

1.98%

-0.15%

Volatility

NOLCX vs. VONE - Volatility Comparison

Northern Large Cap Core Fund (NOLCX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) have volatilities of 4.60% and 4.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOLCXVONEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.60%

4.51%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.50%

9.76%

-0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.35%

12.52%

-0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.17%

17.16%

+2.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.29%

18.29%

+1.00%

NOLCX vs. VONE - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOLCX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VONE's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOLCX vs. VONE - Dividend Comparison

NOLCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.86%, more than VONE's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOLCX
Northern Large Cap Core Fund
7.86%8.57%9.09%8.96%5.02%14.82%1.35%3.93%2.49%2.63%1.78%1.87%
VONE
Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF
1.03%1.07%1.20%1.40%1.59%1.16%1.45%1.65%1.96%1.69%1.89%1.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOLCX and VONE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOLCX has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to VONE (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOLCX dropped -56.64% vs VONE's -34.66%.

NOLCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOLCX and VONE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer