VV vs. IJH
VV (Vanguard Large-Cap ETF) and IJH (iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Index, while IJH is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VV returned 15.78%/yr vs 11.74%/yr for IJH. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for IJH.
Performance
VV vs. IJH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VV achieves a 9.48% return, which is significantly lower than IJH's 15.82% return. Over the past 10 years, VV has outperformed IJH with an annualized return of 15.78%, while IJH has yielded a comparatively lower 11.74% annualized return.
VV
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 9.48%
- 6M
- 9.02%
- 1Y
- 26.45%
- 3Y*
- 21.58%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 15.78%
IJH
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 3.76%
- YTD
- 15.82%
- 6M
- 13.38%
- 1Y
- 27.53%
- 3Y*
- 16.50%
- 5Y*
- 8.90%
- 10Y*
- 11.74%
VV vs. IJH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | 9.48% | 18.11% | 25.25% | 27.18% | -19.91% | 27.41% | 21.04% | 31.25% | -4.46% | 22.00% |
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 15.82% | 7.42% | 13.92% | 16.40% | -13.11% | 24.72% | 13.60% | 26.10% | -11.19% | 16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between VV and IJH is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.89 |
The correlation between VV and IJH shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VV vs. IJH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VV
IJH
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
VV
IJH
Financial Services
VV
IJH
Communication Services
VV
IJH
Consumer Cyclical
VV
IJH
Healthcare
VV
IJH
Industrials
VV
IJH
Consumer Defensive
VV
IJH
Energy
VV
IJH
Utilities
VV
IJH
Real Estate
VV
IJH
Basic Materials
VV
IJH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VV vs. IJH — Risk / Return Rank
VV
IJH
VV vs. IJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VV | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.31 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 3.13 | -0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.78 | 11.45 | +1.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VV vs. IJH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VV drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, roughly equal to the maximum IJH drawdown of -55.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VV and IJH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VV | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.81% | -55.07% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.21% | -8.83% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.97% | -24.10% | +5.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.66% | -24.10% | -1.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.28% | -42.18% | +7.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.80% | -0.12% | -1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.83% | -7.56% | +0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.08% | 2.41% | -0.33% |
Volatility
VV vs. IJH - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) have volatilities of 4.72% and 4.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VV | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 4.59% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.84% | 11.70% | -1.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.59% | 15.87% | -3.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.32% | 19.76% | -2.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.24% | 21.21% | -2.97% |
VV vs. IJH - Expense Ratio Comparison
VV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IJH's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VV vs. IJH - Dividend Comparison
VV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than IJH's 1.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.17% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.46% | 1.68% | 1.18% | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.72% | 1.19% | 1.60% | 1.56% |
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | 0.99% | 1.08% | 1.24% | 1.41% | 1.66% | 1.19% | 1.46% | 1.81% | 2.09% | 1.75% | 1.98% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VV and IJH have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VV has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to IJH (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VV dropped -54.81% vs IJH's -55.07%.
On 10-year performance, VV leads with 15.78% vs 11.74% for IJH. On fees, VV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IJH has been the lower-risk option at 4.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VV has performed better with a 15.78% return vs 11.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for IJH.
IJH has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.99% for VV.
VV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IJH is Mid Cap Blend Equities. VV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Index, while IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VV and 0.05% for IJH.
VV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VV and IJH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer