PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUG vs. VBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUG vs. VBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUG achieves a 6.14% return, which is significantly lower than VBR's 11.45% return. Over the past 10 years, VUG has outperformed VBR with an annualized return of 17.95%, while VBR has yielded a comparatively lower 10.50% annualized return.


VUG

1D
0.33%
1M
-0.73%
YTD
6.14%
6M
5.11%
1Y
23.11%
3Y*
24.71%
5Y*
14.33%
10Y*
17.95%

VBR

1D
0.16%
1M
0.48%
YTD
11.45%
6M
12.14%
1Y
24.85%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
7.78%
10Y*
10.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUG vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
6.14%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
11.45%9.09%12.40%16.00%-9.38%28.08%5.90%22.78%-12.28%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between VUG and VBR is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between VUG and VBR has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VUG vs. VBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VUG
VBR

Technology

53.5%
10.6%

Communication Services

17.3%
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
12.4%

Healthcare

4.6%
7.9%

Financial Services

4.3%
17.6%

Industrials

3.6%
18.1%

Consumer Defensive

1.5%
4.0%

Real Estate

1.0%
10.1%

Utilities

0.9%
4.8%

Basic Materials

0.6%
6.3%

Energy

0.4%
5.2%

Technology

VUG
53.5%
VBR
10.6%

Communication Services

VUG
17.3%
VBR
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VUG
12.2%
VBR
12.4%

Healthcare

VUG
4.6%
VBR
7.9%

Financial Services

VUG
4.3%
VBR
17.6%

Industrials

VUG
3.6%
VBR
18.1%

Consumer Defensive

VUG
1.5%
VBR
4.0%

Real Estate

VUG
1.0%
VBR
10.1%

Utilities

VUG
0.9%
VBR
4.8%

Basic Materials

VUG
0.6%
VBR
6.3%

Energy

VUG
0.4%
VBR
5.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUG vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

VBR
VBR Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUG vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VUGVBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.29

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

2.82

-1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.90

9.94

-5.04

VUG vs. VBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the VBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUG and VBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VUGVBRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

1.65

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.40

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.49

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.42

+0.19

Drawdowns

VUG vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUG drawdown since its inception was -50.68%, smaller than the maximum VBR drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUG and VBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUGVBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.68%

-61.98%

+11.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.53%

-8.85%

-7.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.85%

-24.19%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.61%

-24.19%

-11.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.61%

-45.28%

+9.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.52%

-0.95%

-3.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.09%

-8.26%

+1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.73%

2.51%

+2.22%

Volatility

VUG vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) at 3.67%. This indicates that VUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUGVBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

3.67%

+1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.68%

10.49%

+2.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.25%

15.16%

+1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.28%

19.77%

+2.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.48%

21.74%

-0.26%

VUG vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VBR's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VUG vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison

VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than VBR's 1.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.76%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.38%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


VUG and VBR have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VUG has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to VBR (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VUG dropped -50.68% vs VBR's -61.98%.

On 10-year performance, VUG leads with 17.95% vs 10.50% for VBR. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VBR has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VUG has performed better with a 17.95% return vs 10.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VBR.

VBR has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 0.38% for VUG.

VUG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VBR is Small Cap Value Equities. VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, while VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VUG and 0.05% for VBR.

VBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUG and VBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer