VUG vs. IVV
VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VUG returned 17.90%/yr vs 15.47%/yr for IVV. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.03% expense ratio.
Performance
VUG vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VUG achieves a 4.99% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 9.08% return. Over the past 10 years, VUG has outperformed IVV with an annualized return of 17.90%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively lower 15.47% annualized return.
VUG
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -3.64%
- YTD
- 4.99%
- 6M
- 5.66%
- 1Y
- 22.83%
- 3Y*
- 23.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.78%
- 10Y*
- 17.90%
IVV
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- YTD
- 9.08%
- 6M
- 9.43%
- 1Y
- 25.77%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 13.42%
- 10Y*
- 15.47%
VUG vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 4.99% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 37.03% | -3.32% | 27.72% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 9.08% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUG and IVV is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.94 |
The correlation between VUG and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
VUG vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VUG
IVV
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
VUG
IVV
Communication Services
VUG
IVV
Consumer Cyclical
VUG
IVV
Healthcare
VUG
IVV
Financial Services
VUG
IVV
Industrials
VUG
IVV
Consumer Defensive
VUG
IVV
Real Estate
VUG
IVV
Utilities
VUG
IVV
Basic Materials
VUG
IVV
Energy
VUG
IVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VUG vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
VUG
IVV
VUG vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VUG | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.36 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 2.76 | -1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.43 | 12.43 | -8.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VUG vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUG drawdown since its inception was -50.68%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUG and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VUG | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.68% | -55.25% | +4.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.53% | -8.89% | -7.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.85% | -18.75% | -4.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.61% | -24.53% | -11.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.61% | -33.90% | -1.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.56% | -2.35% | -3.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.09% | -10.77% | +3.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.79% | 1.97% | +2.82% |
Volatility
VUG vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 4.37%. This indicates that VUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VUG | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.73% | 4.37% | +1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.00% | 9.59% | +3.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.46% | 12.28% | +4.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.30% | 16.95% | +5.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 18.08% | +3.40% |
VUG vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VUG and IVV have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VUG vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than IVV's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.08% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, VUG and IVV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VUG has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to IVV (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VUG dropped -50.68% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 10-year performance, VUG leads with 17.90% vs 15.47% for IVV. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VUG has performed better with a 17.90% return vs 15.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG and IVV have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.
IVV has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.39% for VUG.
VUG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VUG and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer