VUG vs. HYG
VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) and HYG (iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, while HYG is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VUG returned 17.88%/yr vs 5.00%/yr for HYG. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VUG charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for HYG.
Performance
VUG vs. HYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VUG achieves a 4.80% return, which is significantly higher than HYG's 1.65% return. Over the past 10 years, VUG has outperformed HYG with an annualized return of 17.88%, while HYG has yielded a comparatively lower 5.00% annualized return.
VUG
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- -1.66%
- YTD
- 4.80%
- 6M
- 3.81%
- 1Y
- 21.18%
- 3Y*
- 23.60%
- 5Y*
- 13.74%
- 10Y*
- 17.88%
HYG
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 2.02%
- 1Y
- 6.61%
- 3Y*
- 8.56%
- 5Y*
- 3.75%
- 10Y*
- 5.00%
VUG vs. HYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 4.80% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 37.03% | -3.32% | 27.72% |
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.65% | 8.59% | 7.97% | 11.54% | -10.98% | 3.76% | 4.47% | 14.09% | -2.02% | 6.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUG and HYG is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2007 | 0.63 |
The correlation between VUG and HYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
VUG vs. HYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VUG
HYG
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Technology
VUG
HYG
-
Communication Services
VUG
HYG
-
Consumer Cyclical
VUG
HYG
-
Healthcare
VUG
HYG
-
Financial Services
VUG
HYG
-
Industrials
VUG
HYG
-
Consumer Defensive
VUG
HYG
-
Real Estate
VUG
HYG
Utilities
VUG
HYG
Basic Materials
VUG
HYG
-
Energy
VUG
HYG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VUG vs. HYG — Risk / Return Rank
VUG
HYG
VUG vs. HYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VUG | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.33 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 2.84 | -1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.44 | 12.46 | -8.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VUG vs. HYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUG drawdown since its inception was -50.68%, which is greater than HYG's maximum drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUG and HYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VUG | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.68% | -34.25% | -16.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.53% | -2.34% | -14.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.85% | -4.56% | -18.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.61% | -15.79% | -19.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.61% | -22.03% | -13.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.73% | 0.00% | -5.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.09% | -3.24% | -3.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.78% | 0.53% | +4.25% |
Volatility
VUG vs. HYG - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a higher volatility of 5.86% compared to iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) at 1.31%. This indicates that VUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VUG | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.86% | 1.31% | +4.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.00% | 3.10% | +9.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.47% | 3.87% | +12.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.31% | 7.53% | +14.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 8.29% | +13.19% |
VUG vs. HYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than HYG's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
VUG vs. HYG - Dividend Comparison
VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than HYG's 5.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.90% | 5.71% | 6.01% | 5.74% | 5.30% | 4.02% | 4.88% | 4.99% | 5.54% | 5.12% | 5.27% | 5.90% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VUG and HYG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VUG has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to HYG (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VUG dropped -50.68% vs HYG's -34.25%.
On 10-year performance, VUG leads with 17.88% vs 5.00% for HYG. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, HYG has been the lower-risk option at 1.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VUG has performed better with a 17.88% return vs 5.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HYG.
HYG has the higher dividend yield at 5.90%, compared with 0.39% for VUG.
VUG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while HYG is High Yield Bonds. VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index, while HYG tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VUG and 0.49% for HYG.
HYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VUG and HYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer