PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUG vs. FSPTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUG vs. FSPTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio (FSPTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUG achieves a 7.94% return, which is significantly lower than FSPTX's 37.30% return. Over the past 10 years, VUG has underperformed FSPTX with an annualized return of 18.30%, while FSPTX has yielded a comparatively higher 27.34% annualized return.


VUG

1D
2.81%
1M
0.27%
YTD
7.94%
6M
9.17%
1Y
26.29%
3Y*
24.04%
5Y*
14.43%
10Y*
18.30%

FSPTX

1D
0.00%
1M
5.59%
YTD
37.30%
6M
39.90%
1Y
69.56%
3Y*
38.55%
5Y*
22.72%
10Y*
27.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUG vs. FSPTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
7.94%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%
FSPTX
Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio
37.30%23.37%41.76%59.83%-36.91%21.99%63.95%51.08%-9.03%49.75%

Correlation

The correlation between VUG and FSPTX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.91

The correlation between VUG and FSPTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUG vs. FSPTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPTX
FSPTX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FSPTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUG vs. FSPTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) and Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio (FSPTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VUGFSPTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.46

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

4.87

-3.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.50

16.01

-10.51

VUG vs. FSPTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the FSPTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUG and FSPTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VUG vs. FSPTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUG drawdown since its inception was -50.68%, smaller than the maximum FSPTX drawdown of -84.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUG and FSPTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUGFSPTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.68%

-84.37%

+33.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.53%

-13.71%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.85%

-29.22%

+6.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.61%

-42.16%

+6.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.61%

-42.16%

+6.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.90%

-6.73%

+3.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.09%

-27.01%

+19.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.79%

4.17%

+0.62%

Volatility

VUG vs. FSPTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) is 6.32%, while Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio (FSPTX) has a volatility of 11.01%. This indicates that VUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUGFSPTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.32%

11.01%

-4.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.28%

18.92%

-5.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.65%

23.21%

-6.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.34%

27.60%

-5.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.51%

26.12%

-4.61%

VUG vs. FSPTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FSPTX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

VUG vs. FSPTX - Dividend Comparison

VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than FSPTX's 7.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSPTX
Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio
7.91%9.06%9.42%0.01%3.95%11.62%18.86%1.86%23.77%8.32%1.54%4.19%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.38%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


VUG and FSPTX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSPTX has higher volatility (11.01%) compared to VUG (6.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VUG dropped -50.68% vs FSPTX's -84.37%.

FSPTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUG and FSPTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer